combination of both probably
Ukraine’s proposed extensive modernization/upgrade process for T-90S Bhishma.
V-92S2 engine to be replaced by 1400HP 6TD-3 with four reverse gears, K-5 ERAs to be replaced by Duplet, TC to get PNK-6 panoramic sight, and bustle auto loader to be added to the rear of the turret.
6 Likes
When was this proposed? The image looks older but would’ve been a massive buff
3 Likes
Before 2012
3 Likes
Wow, so there were multiple projects with engines more powerful than 1200 6TD-2.
Sadly there was no actual “live” project with such more powerful engines. AFAIK the most powerful engine to be actually considered is 6TD-4 (1500hp) for Turkish Altay tanks, but it didn’t go further than proposals.
I wonder what other projects could’ve included 6TD-3/4
3 Likes
SK & NK are at war with each other so whats stopping Ukraine from going into USSR TT if a unified Korea got added?
Because North Korea doesn’t have access to the internet so no one will care
8 Likes
Seems like a rather poor excuse. Though I’m for neither of the former for the same reason that they make no sense. Pre-fall of USSR Ukraine is already in the TT though and that actually does.
Why is it?
3 Likes
The fact that Russia has plenty of domestic equipment to fill what Ukraine would fill. Also the fact that Ukraine has a lot of unique things that wouldn’t all fit into Russia without some major UI changes.
12 Likes
I just think the USSR doesn’t need a sub tree, same with the USA not needing South Korea. (I would go further and say Germany, UK and France don’t need subtrees either).
Even if that happens, the current 3 per line and rank limit would make it harder to fit Ukrainian vehicles while also snubbing domestic Soviet/Russian ones.
3 Likes
I would argue they don’t have enough unique things and it could be easily fitted in, but you misunderstood my logic. These 2 countries are at war. Adding 2 nations at war together is dumbfounded.
I get what you’re saying but two completely different geopolitical events and almost watering it down to fit the phrase. While the Korea’s are technically at war, the Korean Armistice Agreement has been in effect since the early 50’s with no hot war since. Ukraine and Russia are actively in brutal conflict. There’s also the on and off goal of the Korea’s to ‘reunify’.
7 Likes
Ahem ROC/PRC China and S/N Korea cough cough
2 Likes
Germany really needed better air options. Our best CAS was F-4F ICE and Su-22.
Then came the EF-2000 which end like the only high end aircraft.
Now at least we have Hornet with 4 agm65
This doesn’t really refute my point. They have been at war and there have been many near escalations ever since. Also NK announced in 2024 that they do not want peaceful reunification, period. I don’t see any reason they should be fighting together.
Was a bad decision. Vietnam/NK could easily fill the place, which would even make sense.
2 Likes
It does because they haven’t actively been in a hot war unlike Ukraine and Russia. Near escalation is not war. It’s not the same comparison. Also the policy of reunification has always cycled from being a thing to not being a thing.
4 Likes
And when the war stops? Is it justified to add Ukraine to USSR then?
I can agree partially, Air did need more options however the Swiss ground and coastal will most likely be neglected. If there was some subtree with lots of late aircraft and few ground/naval units then I would be more comfortable with it.
UK and France absolutely don’t need India, South Africa or Benelux and now it just harms both the main and subtrees.
3 Likes
I don’t know to be honest, a lot has changed considering the type of equipment Ukraine uses being shifted to Western-derived and how things unfold. Only time will tell.
3 Likes