Yeah it’s just better than the one in-game with a lot of features. At least 9.7.
i wouldnt give it even a 0.3 BR higher, Shilka is just that horrible and new radar and IRST wont impact horrible range of autocannon, Iglas will still atruggle to lock onto helicopters for minutes long.
Seeing it at same BR as Gepard 1A2 that has everything better than it would be hilarious.
While I agree on it being high for a Shilka…unfortunately there’s no way it couldn’t be. Thermals, a new RADAR, and Laser Rangefinder would make it a level higher. In gaijin’s eyes
We already had/have vehicles straight up better sit at same BR, I dont see how this must be an exception if it doesnt actually improve anything significant.
It does though, a Laser Rangefinder alone is a large impact on performance, you’ll be able to accurately burst fire light vehicles across the map and engage helicopters a lot better. 3rd-generation thermals, IRST, and a 360-degree high performance RADAR with IFF does impact the vehicle’s capability quite a bit too. It’s superior to the M4 variant electronically, firepower is the same.
I wouldnt want to be vehicle hunting in Shilka, its no Gepard with insanely hitting APHE. Laser rangefinder wont do much
Only thing mattering, but even then it’s not so important due to radar already being better than thermals even in stock Shilka configuration.
Wouldnt help to improve the range, range is locked by poor autocannon’s caliber.
Shilka’s stock radar is 360°, if you can press more than just W and left click.
So only significant changes is thermal you dont really need and faster scan radar
Doesnt solve any of abysmal issues with low Shilka’s M4 firepower against air amd ground targets.
So I dont see how it should be same BR as Gepard 1A2 or highee.
Australia is going to be sending 49 of their M1A1s to Ukraine to help bolster their armour and firepower
Ukranian PZH 2000 with some nice camoflage of bushes and branches
Do not create offtopic here please.
Do not post photos with crew from live conflict please.
can we post screenshots of combat footage though or is that also of limits?
where its just a part where they drive around
I think it’s obvious it’s of limits
Part of just driving around if crew’s are blurred should be just fine/
dang there were some good images to be had of bradleys with foldable nets
If the image/screenshot can be taken in the context where no combat personnel/symbology are visible and/or can be removed via editing, I’m sure it would be fine.
I’ve posted a few images using AI to remove markings and personnel to showcase the vehicle.
Don’t forget the Ukrainian THAAD
Is this a joke or you are trying to bait people into some off topic talk?