That’s awesome, nice little upgrade hopefully on the way
yep hoping for the best and also there are some places it says the hull is 750mm thick and turret classified but both can stop 125mm russian smoothbore and it also said the “expected” enemy would be the T72M witch it cannot stop its 420mm pen dart or its 440mm pen dart…
Need to do somr digging on its protection values
Is this forum still active
1 Like
Looks it
Wasn’t the Rooikat 105 going to have the same imagery equipment as the TTD
1 Like
Idk where you got that idea. Most Gen 1 thermals are 120x1 detectors. Many gen 2 are 288x4. TTD is very much gen 1 thermals.
I didn’t claim that, OP did, I just quoted them
Sorry meant to quote them, I quoted your quote
1 Like
Yes this presentation is actually offset from the generations that industry markets, seeing as first gen (as the presenation describes it) was not viable for anything outside of basically target seekers. When you view it with that adjustment it makes sense. 1st gen views in AFVs are typicallt 120x1, 2nd gen are smaller two dimensional arrays, and current 3rd gen are larger focal plane arrays.
Can we get a suggestion for the TTD 120 soon.
With the optional composite armour.
1 Like
I’ve seen the report just wondering if this assumption 'assumed to be the PC-MCT 120 ’ is correct
Ahh soz i misunderstood
2 Likes
If the TVD they talk about is truly it, then yes.
1 Like
its not the best evidence but probably is correct, Elbit developed a 120 element thermal imager so hence the 120 element talk about in TTD marketing is likely the same.
source they use
I’ve done research and the TTD and Olifant 2 used the GS60 and CS60N primary sighting systems but the Rooikat Mk.2 and Rooikat MTTD used the GS65 and CS60N sights, then the Olifant Mk.1B Optimum (as the Olifant 2 was later renamed) and Rooikat 105 both got either the GS65 and CS65 or GS72 and CS72(T/N variant)