Could you please provide some examples? I want to look into this further
There are many examples like this, such as the mounting issues of the reaction JH7A, including the quantity of kh29 and combat ammunition. For instance, the recent cm502, and so on. Brother, if you’re interested, this post has a detailed summary.现在我们来细数一下不公平的待遇 - #66 by 充气小伙伴
Even these are just the tip of the iceberg. On Chinese forums, I have seen many people spend a lot of time and effort collecting official information and evidence, but in the end, the administrator only marks it as nab due to insufficient information or language reasons.
In addition, there are also some malicious treatments, such as a blogger named 99a_2 collecting a large amount of information to prove that the ZTZ99 series model is incorrect. Although Gaijin admitted the mistake and remade the model, not only did the main error still exist (hollow shield mechanism), but he also casually weakened the thickness of the main armor without any evidence.
Overall, gaijin would rather fabricate something that does not exist for China (such as modern China using the unique gunpowder of World War II Japan), and obtain the minimum data from almost all equipment manuals, than restore China’s weapon data (for example, in a recent live broadcast, gaijin weakened the CM502 based on personal speculation)
快删了吧,真的,没错期望的中系更新就是一坨,从2022年入坑直到现在,三年时间中系的更新就没有一次不让人失望的
Would it be possible to get direct links to those bug reports?
Don’t sorry, as an Israel main I have experiene with this first hand. Prime example is the Merkava 4 receiving made-up hydraulic equipment in the damage model while it is common knowledge that the Merkava 4 has completely eliminated all hydraulic equipment.
The inconcistencies with equipment specifications have been a recurring theme for many years now, every dev server there are hundreds of reports for so many issues a simple internet search can provide info directly from the manufacturer. I am not sure what the cause of this is, maybe the historical research team is understaffed. Who knows
相关帖子(比如: Chinese top tier MBT should receive spall liners - Game Discussion / General Discussion - War Thunder — official forum)会被锁定建议提交给issue区,issue区已通过却不实装,这不死锁了吗,卡在这里了属于是。
说实话,战雷官方论坛以各种复杂规则限制玩家讨论,很多本质上可以深入讨论的话题被管理员莫名其妙的掐掉。比如他们提供了一个general discussion标签,我懒得了解这些细分tag的内容就直接在这个广泛标签下发了个关于红旗16A SAM系统的建议,管理员直接关闭了我的帖子并且在我修改了分类后也没有重新开放。
实际上,大多中国玩家由于缺少境外网络访问渠道,我们在这里的声量本来就无法反映真实的中国玩家诉求,更多时候是双拳不敌四手被众多冷嘲热讽的声音淹没,让玩家志愿者定期从百度贴吧反馈意见并及时处理才是更有效的渠道。就我发帖的体验来说,战争雷霆官方论坛的使用体验称得上糟糕,完全不符合中文互联网下一般使用者的直觉。
支持删除中系 一直靠信仰玩着 真被恶心到了
可以创建泛亚这个科技树吗,将例如中国,越南,老挝,泰国,柬埔寨,缅甸,马来西亚,日本,韩国等,这几个国家放在一起,我认为这个可以有效减少一些争议
Can we create a pan Asian technology tree by merging countries such as China, Vietnam, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia, Myanmar, Malaysia, Japan, and South Korea.? I believe this can effectively reduce some controversies
泛世界吧 哈哈哈哈
按顶级之前的排队数量,完全可以做到 泛世界 vs 俄罗斯
还真是,但是比这种恶心人的,将中系载具加入到日系会好些吧,而且,韩国科技树说实话我还挺期待的,毕竟现在迟迟不加入韩国科技树不也是因为政治争议嘛,毕竟都是在这个地区的国家,再怎么说也不能否认所处地区吧
我也支持
同意,东亚国家可以直接整合,除了日本。。。
支持,不想好好做,种族歧视,那就别做
我中系空军全开,支持gaijin删除中系。
韩国的500kg滑行炸弹已经要给日系的泰国飞机了。
哈哈哈哈 这下中韩友好靠鬼子了
确实,如果不给完整性能只是一个换皮的载具,我也同意将中系在游戏里删除
对比MI28的“产品305”,现在的情况就是,两个导弹明明差不多,给直升机提升了相同权重,MI28能带16发“产品305”,一发命中就能干掉一辆主战坦克,而Z-10只能带12发根本打不死人的CM502KG,类似削弱中国载具的操作有很多,您可以看一下这个视频,它有500,000次播放、90,000点赞、800条留言,里面逐一列举了中国载具的被制作的垃圾之处。
【万字讨贼檄文——罄竹难书的战争雷霆】 万字讨贼檄文——罄竹难书的战争雷霆_战争雷霆
中系删了是对的