Okay, thank you for your suggestion. I forgot to translate, and my subsequent responses will be in English.
1 Like
China is not yet operating the JF-17. Does that mean it is not a Chinese plane but rather a Pakistani plane? Should the JF-17 be included in the U.S. technology tree just because Pakistan has a good relationship with the United States?
1 Like
the jf17 is a pakistani plane and it doesnt look like the players dont like the techtree situation. and I doubt that giving the us techtree stuff from pakistan would be seen more positive(than it is rn)…
1 Like
Hehe
1 Like
And for that reason it’s in the game with what flag???
That looks like Pakistan to me. Do I see a chinese flag? I don’t think so.
Oh and is Pakistan a sub-tree to the US? I don’t think so.
An American plane in another tree.
That looks like a Thai flag for a Thai plane to me.
Is Thailand a branch of the US? Nope, the plane goes to it’s OPERATOR nation.
8 Likes
How is everything we discussing related to Thailand?
1 Like
dont know, chinese are searching for a reason not to add the tank to thailand
1 Like
Aren’t I the same as you? You think that since China doesn’t operate the VT4, it should appear on the Thai technology tree. Then what’s the issue if I think the JF17, which China does not operate, appears on the American technology tree? I’m just providing an example based on your perspective.
1 Like
I’m sorry, I didn’t understand what you were saying, it might be a translation issue.
1 Like
I’m sorry, but I do not agree with your point of view. Your statement has no basis at all. If we were really like you said, why would we not oppose T84 joining the Thai sub-tech tree in Japan? Please do not slander us.
2 Likes
We are not the same. I think vehicles go to their operator nations, especially when that nation is consolidated to an entire tree or branch.
If Pakistan is a branch of the US tree, then I support Pakistani JF17 going to the US tree. But right now, Pakistan isn’t a branch to any tree UNLIKE Thailand. Their vehicles are subject to be placed anywhere just like the commonwealth vehicles.
So far Pakistani vehicles have only been added in the Chinese tree. Does it mean Pakistan is a branch of the Chinese tree? Not until Gaijin officially says so.
1 Like
I know and there wasnt an argument made which would have worked.
maybe my part wasnt specific enough with the vehicles. its only for the thai vehicles which were bought from china.
Then I have nothing to say. When you only consider this one question without bringing up another for comparison, your argument is already untenable because it cannot be judged at all.
1 Like
might be true due to the nature of having stuff already there, but there isnt nearly enough stuff from pakistan to call it a techtree addition.
This is unrelated, but I hope Pakistan becomes a subtree to China officially.
For example I would like to see the Oplot-P, a variant of the Oplot developed for Pakistan.
4 Likes
Well, you are right that gaijin hasn’t added too many Pakistani vehicles to the Chinese tech tree in the game.
2 Likes
It seems that he installed a T84 turret on a T80 chassis, right? I also seem to have seen information saying that Pakistan purchased T84.
2 Likes
watch out with the topic since this will probably lead to your comment being deleted
I agree, but Pakistan shouldn’t be given the 5th line in Chinese tech tree. Too unpromising. Would be better to implement it like India.
2 Likes
I remember that India seems to appear as British operations and team vehicles in the game, right? This seems to be the same situation as Pakistan in the Chinese tech tree.
4 Likes