The Chinese techtree should also be filled with vehicles with equal strength compared to the type90/90B/(pre)90B/10/TKX which has 4 second reloading and fantastic mobility . Chinese apex MBTs still have glued tracks and leaky armor . The VT5 is moving to 11.3 , 0.6 BR more than when it first appears but its wrong armor has never changed , it is discrimination against Chinese players and Chinese people .
But the VT-5 is Bangladeshi lmao
To the complaining chinese players. Thailand should get Thai vehicles in the Thai sub-tree.
Whatever your reasoning is to prevent THAI vehicle from going into the THAI subtree, It is Gaijin’s decision and not yours.
Thai players and fans of Thai vehicles should not have to grind a different Tech tree to get access to all Thai Vehicles. Especially if it’s just 1 vehicle and it’s high in BR.
Denying Thai vehicle to Thai sub-tree because of your own problems with other people is not fair to Thai sub-tree and those interested in playing it.
8 Likes
Why is there no T84 in the Soviet system ? We Soviet players also want to play
2 Likes
T84 is Ukrainian. Made by Kharkiv Morozov after the soviet union collapsed… Please read up on the history of T-84.
2 Likes
Modern day politics make it somewhat hard to do something of the sort without a lot of backlash from members in the community.
You definitely will get it, there is no other choices for Ukrainian vehicle
1 Like
Because I play the Japanese tree and it’s fun to make pure line ups out of sub tree tech and I can play what ever I want so cry me river dear
This conversation will not be continuing, Go back to discussing the topic of this thread.
8 Likes
Anyways, it’ll be nice to see japan get more tanks, I hope we get to see the BTR-3s as well.
BTR-3K specifically would be something I’d definitely grind for.
2 Likes
That a SAM or ATGM carrier?
ATGM, uses Stugna/Barrier.
1 Like
Seems this topic is a never-ending hellhole.
Burns even hotter than the Salamander chapter’s forge at their home planet’s volcano.
CN players dislike, Thai players like.
They fight. mods show up and make them chill down.
Topic escapes from derailment and becomes on topic.
But new guys from both sides eventually show up and lit the fire again with political things.
Just like a damn merry-go-round.
5 Likes
No, I am a chinese player but I do not like it.
Maybe it was his sacarsm comment, I think.
By the way, as long as you keep the political things out of discussions
(It is a violation of the forum rule, as mods have said countless times.)
And you need to stick with English outside of the ‘national community’ section.
Welcome to the forum.
1 Like
I’m tired of arguing about sub-tech trees. If the gaijin wants the VT4 in the Japanese tech tree, then go for it. I just wish the Chinese tech tree got the M1A1T. The top Chinese BR MBTs all have 7.1 second reloads, which makes them way underpowered.
The strange thing is that the M1A1T was accepted by gaijin two years ago, but it has never been released. I hope it can be released together with the VT4 in the Japanese tech tree this time.
8 Likes
At present, the foreign vehicles in China’s technology tree mainly come from Pakistan, Bangladesh and North Korea, all of which have good relations with China. The Philippines currently has a poor relationship with China, but there are indeed no vehicles from the Philippines in the technology tree.
However, the relationship between China and Japan is completely different. The relationship between China and Japan cannot even be described as bad; it can be said to be full of hatred.
1 Like
To Chinese players, it’s no different from when the American players or Germany players find that gaijin adding captured M1 and Leopard to Russia’s tech tree .
As a Chinese, I’m very glad that Thai players can play with the VT4 the game, but definitely not under the Japanese tech tree.
2 Likes
They are not the same because China has never been a part of Japan.
3 Likes