Yes I did answered your questions, the AGM-65 do operate in a environment where it outperforms counterparts because said counterparts doesn’t exist, where it is manual guided missiles or regular rockets.
AGM-65 can outperform any anti-air system it faces at most battle rating it’s present, specially at battle rating 10.3, when most systems like 2S6, Roland 1 and similars are simply unreliable over 5,00 km whever the missile is slow to counter before you are a target or can’t reach such distances.
Last I checked Hudler’s the only Soviet main among the group that arrived.
MotorolaCRO is a 5 tech tree player that has expanded into 3 more tech trees for a total of 8.
And cyrilic name here is a 2 tech tree player: Japan and Soviets.
Even though Hudler is a Soviet main, he’s close to getting USA and Germany up there.
Yeah. I had a long rebuttal all typed up, ridiculing the absolute banger of a 5km claim and addressing the “to the same degree” part they’re dancing around.
That’s the problem. Not that some maverick launchers out-range their spaa opponents (as if mavericks launched at 12km have a snowflakes chance in hell of hitting), but that the kh-38 out-ranges and out-performs its opponent spaa to such a ridiculous degree.
But, it’s just too dammed hot to have the same arguments about the kh-38 again, especially if we get into how the MT is over performing to such a degree it would make Pravda blush.
I closed out of the post-battle screen so I was limited to the hit analysis screen for a screenshot at the time.
Dismissing evidence is a double edged sword as you invite everyone to dismiss your statements.
I won’t, but I will warn you people have a valid reason to now.
How would basic facts that everyone agrees on be bait?
It does not matter how much better AGM-65D is over AS-20 Nord. All that matters is how much better is the AGM-65D range is over the SPAA the aircraft faces.
@_Ladies_Man_217 @GALWAYLION-live “hates” America so much his played tech trees are China, Italy, and Sweden.
Dude mains the “minor nations”.
He bought Raam Sagol, Chally 2 OES, and Type 16 FPS.
And apparently I’m toxic for supporting suggestions, supporting vehicle additions to tech trees that need it, supporting balance and realism, and so forth…
Clearly not everyone agrees on this considering how many people are arguing with you,
The discussion was about comparing the capabilities of nations to each other so comparing the same weapon types of 2 nations at the same tier is completely valid
