For the love of god, this is actually annoying now.
The AAs got 100% interception rate back again
bro why didnt they use ITOs and Tunguskas in modern conflict? a bunch is genuinely capable of intercepting 100s of incoming munition in game.
-
the amount of AAs needs to be reduced. please put only 2 SHORADS at the outposts.
-
remove the AAs within tank and artillery convoys, they are the worst of all, never spotted and always launch at you in the worst possible moment.
-
Drastically increase reload rates, They reload stupidly fast.
-
Model actual interception rates linked to speed of incoming munition. They just intercept ANYTHING thrown at them at this point, this doesnt make sense.
-
Give Medium range AA trigger discipline. AAs, especially S300s, literally start launching the moment you take off. This becomes hella annoying as the missile barely has any energy to hit you if you are actively maneuvering, but still has enough to kill you if you are not multipathing, this puts a very lame and unrealistic limitation on players option to stay defensive all the time, Not to mention the fact that there are multiple of these batteries launching at you, this makes understanding the RWR incredibly difficult as it is completely cluttered by these
-
Model “MISSILE STOCKPILES” for AAs. IRL these systems have limited stockpiles. They should use their missiles KEEPING THE REMAINING AMOUNT OF MISSILES IN MIND. Currently they launch like 20 to 30 missiles just to intercept a incoming HARM, like wtf thats gonna be like more than 100x cost just to intercept that missile.
The stockpiles are only replenished by incoming convoys/supplies.
Supply quantity should be linked to amount of depots currently functional on the map. If there are none, the missile stockpile refill will be near to none. -
Model LOAL for ARMs. The arms NEVER TEND TO LOCK BACK on the AAs. They have IOG and all yet i have seen them LITERALLY TURN AWAY WITH FULL FORCE if the AA turns off its radar. this makes completely no sense.