+1
2 Likes
Would be an nice Heli filler for the 9.7 - 12.0 area
+1
1 Like
3^7 so 4,374 roketa 🙀
1 Like
Lol there’s a comma
Maybe 11.0 ish? +1
10.0 according to Tiger HAP.
+1, The fact it’s such a modern helicopter with shit armament would make a nice dynamic for BR 10.0-10.3.
1 Like
i would also like to see the model of the uht without the ASGARD mod…
( lighter airframe, no external Antenna ) but basicallly just a remaking of the flightmodel rn. bcs in game it doesnt say that it is the ASGARD version would be nice to have that changed.
best regards
1 Like
hopefully they add both an early and a KHT variant (with THOR upgrade) so we can have a greater battlefield presence (think 12 PARS 3 LR ATGMs and 144 countermeasures… and if gaijin is generous, LFK-NG and RMK-30 autocannon)
3 Likes
I would honestly go without a cannon and even aams (for 12 pars) if gaijin just added the damn proxy fuse on the pars, it can already smoke all Helicopters except the mi28 if it’s smart and i killed a lot of planes with it even without proxy.
its missing proxy AND a whole kilometer of range lol
They changed the Pars physics a while ago and the only reason it doesn’t go more is because of the self destruction limit, it can comfortably kill Helis at max range (you used to only be able to get 5km, maybe 6) if you have a bit of altitude and angle it a bit.
It’s weight got reduced from 49kg to 41kg so that made it almost 20% lighter which will reflect in range and got 10G lateral acceleration, idk how that compares to g, but it’s hilarious it’s kind of comparable to the stinger (if it had proxy).
1 Like
Many of my friends use it in place of the stinger lol.
Esp in headons
lmao imagine going through 2 BO-105 with HOT atgm, just to research another heli using HOT atgm.
This must have a lower br than the MI24-P
Ideally the Bo-105 PAH 1A1 should be a modification for the PAH 1. Then this comes in at 10.0 and we get a heli with thermals, chaff and flares and MAW. Imagine that eh?
Both BO-105 should be foldered. Still with the thermals, it has a slower and weaker atgm than the german mi24 (this also has chaff and flares). Not to mention the pain grinding the HOT3 with only 2 rocket pods.
Probably should get 2 HOT-3 on each inner pylon as stock.
That’s how most helis are supposed to be (except the Mi-24 lol)
would be nice if they just removed the external Antenna and reduce the weight by 100kg or so…
then we would at least not have the heavier ASGARD version anymore and they still could add an early version or smth like that.
1 Like
The addition of the premium HAD-E shows precedent that the concept of a watered down UHT is balanced in the German tree. I think this would be a perfect way to finally folder the 1A1 without adding one of the PT versions and while still keeping the grind for the UHT. To me 10.7/10.3 would be best because of two reasons. Firstly, the lack of a chin turret means self-defence in close range engagements against other aircraft is terribly inconsistent. Secondly, placing it in 10.7/10.3 means it fits better within Germany’s 10.7 lineup as we can finally have a heli that isn’t obsolete while not uptiering us to where our ground vehicles are greatly outclassed.
2 Likes
Exactly.
Though im more in favour of it being 11.0 since the 10.7 lineup works better at 11.0. I use the VJTF and 22M4 alongside the leo 2A4 (i hope they give it the baulos 8 modification or add the baulos 8 with DM33 at 11.0) as well as this UHT early so buff the lineup.
With the soon to be coming buffs to the Roland systems, it would be a good BR for German lineups.
1 Like