Humor at its purist.
I do recommend you check the vehicle first. At least do a test drive. Even if you only check Tiger H1 in the garage, you’d notice those S mine launchers. We’ve already have enough jokes in the forum by now, more is not needed.
1 Like
The launchers are not the entire coverage of the tank hull.
The premiums are Tiger H1 standards.
And that is why I say you should test drive first. You don’t feel ashamed for wasting other’s time at all?
Damn the salt in this game is real intense.
8 Likes
hey,just let you know,you can say : i have skill issue, it’s easier to say and everyone can understand it immediately instead of write a long post like this
those tiger premium is so easy to destroy,even in a hand of experience players,and i’m tired to see those player like you keep yapping how p2w for it,sound like US main player .
8 Likes
Saids a guy with only 2 vehicles in his garage above KD 3 after 30 matches, despite you have played GRB twice the time I did. It seems your extra time doesn’t make much difference.
You know, it’s kind of ironic, especially when you could see through my service record that I mainly play ARB…
I wouldn’t say that you lack skills or something, because I ain’t that skilled to laugh at you either. But at the very least I can see that neither of your tech tree tigers reached KD2, while you Tiger Ost is above KD3.
Just admit that you enjoy p2w and don’t care about the health of BR system at all, alright? At least don’t be so noisy that everyone can see it.
Actually, I’d appreciate your support, because you have become a live proof to me on “pack tigers being p2w” and “the community don’t mind p2w at all”.
If you really want to discuss about whether pack tigers are p2w, just check the posts above. I have already written a lot. I also wrote about the test performed in custom battle.
listen here friend, let me get this strange to the point
for person like you, even gaijin bring it on 6.3 you won’t be happy
this game have 4-5 slots in hangar for you, the point of this is helping you to have more strategy by the type of that tank, and of couse,all nation will have a counter option on soft target,thin targer,air,ect…
also,we don’t just head to head , face to face like an idiot , we have something call “flanking” to help you hit on enemy heavy tank side
i played the tiger ost,west,even the P version in RGB, i still get destroyed by M36,M4A2,T-35-85 or even M109
and its fair
you say this is for the health of br system,but i can only seen you do it for yourself
the tiger is fine at the br,and that will not change
7 Likes
just lol…
Complains about a boxy 100mm armored tank with bad mobility, bad gun handling, and a cupola insta death weakspot. I bought the pack because they look cool, but play absolutely terrible on those small, CAS infested maps. They dont even feel like heavytanks when im bullying them in my M18 or M109s, M51…
5 Likes
No, no, you don’t understand; the box with 100mm of flat armor deserves to go up in BR because it got 10mm of extra armor in some parts.
The eternal Heavy Tank curse.
If it is able to withstand ONE shot from an up tiered Medium Tank while being perfectly angled and positioned, then it deserves to be upped in BR until its armor becomes irrelevant, apparently.
All tanks armed with 77, 85, 90, 100 and 122mm guns can punch through this tank like a hot knife through butter EVEN when angled. Just because it can do well against 75s and 76s it doesn’t mean it should be upped in BR until it can’t withstand anything.
The reason why Tiger E is higher in BR is because it has a better engine, better roof armor and a stronger cupola. A couple of Tiger H1s getting 10mm of extra armor in some places does not warrant an increase in BR…
9 Likes
30mm of track, as good as 15mm armor. In the area of between 100m and 400m range, this armor makes a significant difference. I already said those above. Gonna edit the main oost and link these lines.
Sounds like massive skill issue to me.
The add on armor doesnt Cover much the massive weakspot cupola still exists.
Even the camouflage is useless dince anyone could just put bushes on and have the same result
4 Likes
And yet you ignored my lines pointing out you have much better stats in pack tigers than in tech tree Tigers. Very smart change of subject.
no,you are the one don’t understand my friend, that 30mm is nothing,we tiger players still and MUST angle at all cost , most of them still can pen us if we face our hull to them,i have tigis,and yes, that 30mm did nothing,still angle like every day
and you think we have a good eyes ? get to the position like the flash and angle at the right moment ?
and you think those t34 and m4 sherman players are stupid and don’t know where to hit ?
they always shot at the cupola my friend, ALWAYS
know why the hellcat get on 6.0 when they have the same gun as m4a2 but anything can kill it ?
because they just fast,get to good potision quick and can pen side armor with one shot
what do tiger have to get up br ? a big cupola ? they just walking box at high br ,no speed,just…nothing
and you know what funny ? this post yapping about a small 30mm armor on each side of the tiger, while there still some space in the middle to shoot
you are underate and disrespect the ww2 player my friend, tiger just like food for them
1 Like
but are we talking about tigers pack ?
1 Like
you know what,those player like you just know how to complain,don’t even have experience,check my stats ? huh ? very smart move and very dumb way to use it and talk about how strong are tiger pre
what a waste of time
The massive weakspot is front armor, because there is ammo rack behind far left or right (gaijin have been changing them resently) of front armor. I have edited the main post so you may see some of the conclusion. I consider this a big difference, according to my experience.
And another thing. If you really want to say “skill issue” or something, better check people’s service record first.
15mm worth of of one-off additional armor in some spots isn’t “much better”.
There are many tanks that are either marginally better or marginally worse at the same BR… because, functionally, they are still the same.
Not every slight difference warrants a BR change, because, then, we would pretty much need a BR for every single vehicle ingame, since none is exactly 1:1 to any other.
That’s like saying that Leopard 2A5 and Leopard 2A6 should be different BRs over the 30mm pen difference even though they are otherwise identical;
Or that Strv 122B+ should be a different BR than the other Strv 122s because it has marginally better side armor, etc.
4 Likes
Whatever you say. It seems you are the one saying “skill issue” first, and when it turns out you are not skilled enough, and really rely on the paid advantage to win, you start crying. You still haven’t answered about the difference of your stats between pack tigers and tech tree tigers.
I have already given my test results, and discussed them with my friends. They agree that this is indeed p2w, and the thing is even a bit worse than Italian/Swedish premium 75mm cannon Shermans.
By the way, all these goes the same for KV-1s when facing Pz4, Turm III or M10. And yet, tanks like KV-1E is absolute biased. In a downtier, KV-1 (Zis-5) could be one man army.
Still, I am talking about pack tigers. The tech tree Tigers need to angle so much that their maneuver become limited(so that you may have enough angle). However, the pack tigers don’t. You can also see it as the effectiveness of angle.
I have edited the main post, and wrote a slight bit of the conclusion. I do recommend you ask a friend to help you perform this test.
I would say that this is more than the L2A5 and L2A6 difference. It’s like the difference between M4 (at 3.7) and Italian/Swedish premium Sherman.
I would rather they just give the tech tree tigers the extra track armor and remove the mine launchers
1 Like