Don’t bother. Dude literally claimed Su-30SM doesn’t carry R-77
3 Likes
Oh dear… that’s like saying the F-16A didn’t carry AIM-9Js and the only proof being “because I said so”
Their claim was based on not seeing pictures of it. Ofc this was easily debunked as you can see I provided 2 pictures of it by just searching the front page of google images
2 Likes
innacuracy and the cope in this is insane
2 Likes
The F16c got its hmd in 2006
The F/A-18C got its hmd in 2006
The F-15E got its hmd in 2010
Saying the US airframes are 30 years behind everything else is a bad faith argument
On top of that the Su30sm might have entered service with the Russians in 2013 but the Su30mki (which is basically the same) entered service in 2002 and the Su30mk even before that
What about the Mica, Aam4, Pl-12, r77, Derby or Pl8b
More 03-04 time frame.
You know that if you get the 120c-7 every other nation is going to get a long range equivalent which is probably going to outperform the amraam, iam talking meteor, pl17, r37m or just a ungimped mica
Doesn’t really change my point tho
Saying all the US airframes are from the 80tys is just a bad faith argument
2 Likes
Because the one we have in game is from 2010
1 Like
Sometimes you start to believe individuals on here aren’t real 😂
4 Likes
Ehh. Depends how technical you want to get. The airframe itself hasn’t changed much besides the E. Just components inside it. But then again you look at it from that angle then the US is just still flying aircraft from that time IRL.
the flanker is from the 80tys as well
the su27ub which eventually became the su30 is from the late 80tys/ early 90tys
and we arent even talking about the chinese flankers yet
1 Like
That’s the point. If you want to get technical these aircraft are all earlier. Personally my only gripe with the F-18C late Gaijin added is the fact they called it an “late” it’s not. Other than that the airframe I believe is over preforming I don’t think it is supposed to be able to make mach with that many AMRAAMS but I might be mistaken I would have to double check.
your feeling should be right i think, would have to look at the operational limitations tho
F-15JM is still a solid top tier jet might not be the big 3 but still acceptable. Not to mention it has multiple buffs it can get like maws, and buffs to AAM-3 and AAM-4 which both are artificially handicapped by a large margin.
Depending how they add what ever version of the F-2 they plan first it could be a nice support.
1 Like
If we got 120D-3 maybe. Not C-7 though.
Also, AIM-174 is counterpart to PL-17 and R-37M
But the pl-17 and 37m are years older than the 174. That’s hardly fair.
aim-9x 2003
can we stop bringing “oh its induction date is late, bias”