They should add an equivalent of MAW technology for ground vehicles

I asked google if i am the best warthunder gamer on earth. Here is the answer of google ai.

Blockquote
Key Takeaway: Being the “best” is relative, but tracking your performance on leaderboards and stats sites show that you’re among the top performers in War Thunder.

Sweet. True lies

He wrote the title, silly Gunjob!

3 Likes

I don’t know, you guys didn’t want to talk about the subject, you wanted to talk about AI and my life lol.

just realised you’re the same person who brought us this gem

thank you for your service sir

The whole world feeds the AI, not just the kenians

Nah I’m good my man, I even got a bonus last year.

Please just make your own researched responses instead of using AI. To this day I have not seen a singular AI response here that was 100% correct.

9 Likes

I think you should educated a bit yourself. The big tech companies have people in Kenia and Uganda that have nothing else to do than to validate, edit or remove content from the Ai systems. Meta is currently being sued in Kenia, because of very bad employement conditions. The Ai models learns only what these people allow. They edit the sources.

1 Like

You’re just reading my AI response now

Well, I do.

I wasn’t. Stop trying to ragebait canım

Wait a minute, google just said that I am among the best player of WT on earth. That must be 100% correct ;-)

It must be true then.

However, I’m not sure AI does have all the data it needs to affirm such a thing.

It proves I’m not crazy and know what I’m talking about

yes, you are very correct, Russia is the best nation and everything else sucks and is unfun

AI is just a million Google searches compiled together. It doesn’t differ from a regular Internet research whatsoever.

Even on the Internet, false informations can spread. AI uses statistics to correct these, using the thoughts of the majority of the people to actually say if information X is right or false.

I trust more AI than any regular Google search lol

Difference is that it doesn’t differentiate between trustworthy and not a lot of the time, what‘s the argument here?

“Oh AI is basically just searching through the internet but faster”, yea, misinformation included, you‘re aware?

1 Like

Do you differentiate between trustworthy sources and the ones that are not, when you do your research ?

Of course you do. You check a lot of sources, then you think and you admit those particular ones are fake.

AI does exactly the same by compairing millions of responses on the Internet. For 500 millions responses saying the color blue is blue, 50 millions will say the color blue is red. AI will deduce the color blue is blue.

It is not harder than that

Yeah and that’s fine for compiling a list of sources or references but not for directly answering a question.

1 Like

I won against the Russians at 12.7 like 15 minutes ago, am I cheating chat ?