They completely ruined the M103 for no reason [I have since verified that they have in-fact, ruined the model]

Gaijin ended up making just about the absolute worst changes to the M103 they could’ve possibly made… The tank is now more structurally weaker than it should ever be, and the actual in game model was changed so poorly it now resembles the model from world of tanks… What a -0 out of 10 update lol. Thanks Gaijin for just completely randomly deciding to ruin the M103, that’s great guys. The new one has to be one of the least accurate M103’s I’ve ever seen, why did they fatten and squish the tank?!

The new models hull is waaaay too wide and the turret also suffers from this issue plus the turret seems to be about 1.5/2 feet shorter than it’s supposed to be especially when looking at the area around the main gun and HMG, the turrets curvature is also very wrong and extends about 10% more on each side than it should.
Overall, the model is a graphical improvement and parts of it are more accurate to the real M103, but the color and stature need some serious work. [Direct model comparison has been added for context as most people seem to be misunderstanding this post so far]

Old M103
Old M103
New M103
New M103

Not to mention that they completely ruined a decade’s worth of skins for this tank also for no reason.

This tank is now not only unplayable but also ugly and disproportionately inaccurate to the real tank in size and performance. Seriously try it out for yourselves in-game it’s a complete turd now.

Hopefully they’re planning to release the M103A2 and that’s why the base M103 is now so terrible…
At-least that’s what one could hope.

And yes, I was being intentionally excessive when I said RUINED.

Edit: NEVER-MIND I WASNT BEING EXCESSIVE WHEN I SAID RUINED. I CHECKED ACTUAL DOCUMENTS AND THIS THING IS HORRIBLE!

Scroll down to see what I’m talking about, it’s even worse than I though lol.

FOCAL LENGTH

it looks different because the camera is not the same as in game

4 Likes

“Focal length” doesn’t apply here as I’m not just talking about pictures, it’s true that I did compare it with multiple images, the one in the post is just for closest visual reference. My main reference comes from something real as I live near one of the actual tanks and the new in-game size is definitely inaccurate.

Besides, the model isn’t even the biggest issue here it’s the armor that really bothers me. It’s that they made this thing into a slug that gets one shot easier when such a large nerf was not needed for the M103, the T58 on the other hand… that thing needed a tweak or two, but as far as I’m aware no one was complaining about the M103 in such a way that it would obtain such a colossal nerf.

Proof?

Also this has to be an irony post, cause this whole premise is so silly

Nah guy, this isn’t a meme. Gaijin did all of this lol, have you even played the update yet? This tank was nerfed armor wise, that is a fact. There’s already been videos posted about it if you don’t want to play the tank for yourself https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFoSzzsO6-w

I’d like to add that the direct tank comparison also confirms everything I’ve said so far about the tanks model changes, once again no not irony or a joke. ITS FACT

Old M103
Old M103
New M103
New M103

Wow you can pen the LFP with BR-412D, such a big change… it really isn’t and you failed to convince me.

-60 plus mm of possible frontal armor protection isn’t considered a big change to you? ok bro, whatever you say. I will give you one thing, after checking myself it isn’t that huge of a downgrade on every shot type like you said. But it’s still bad

how did they ruin M103? they look the same to me

1 Like

It’s a 7.7 frequently facing like Raketenautomat | War Thunder Wiki IT-1 | War Thunder Wiki, Chieftain Mk 5 | War Thunder Wiki Rooikat Mk.1D | War Thunder Wiki Vickers Mk.11 | War Thunder Wiki ZTZ59D1 | War Thunder Wiki Object 122MT "MC" | War Thunder Wiki
You understand why I don’t think this is a big deal?

His video proof is literally just BR-412D penning the LFP in the proc analysis when it couldn’t before


Oh damn I can’t believe it, the turret looks small…

Or is it…

It’s called FoV.

4 Likes

Yeah, but as far as I’m concerned it really doesn’t fit that BR anymore.

Idk why there’s people coming in to defend Gaijin on this one lol. You guys do know these are unnecessary changes for the M103 Right? Changes that don’t really seem to have much of any positive impact at all.

Maybe try looking at the direct model comparison while you’re at it. Besides I’m mainly talking about the nerfs the tank received.

I mean, you could always pen the LFP with guns with 220mm pen and such on the small slit slightly under the UFP/LFP seams. Only difference is that it’s less of a volumetric hell because back then the tiny plates easily overlap.

What direct model comparison?

Old M103
Old M103
New M103
New M103

This comparison.

Yes, the volumetric is better for sure lol I’m not crazy enough to say it was better before… BUT it’s still an unnecessary nerf that should put the tank down in BR a bit.

And… what does this supposed to mean? Like it’s not even on the same angle.

The only thing that’s quite noticeable is the taller turret ring which is questionable.

I don’t even… WHAT? How Would. Why would???

WHAT DO YOU MEAN?!

You have eyes, right?

You can see that their different, right?

Not trying to be excessively rude but it’s clear the model has changed very noticeably. I don’t get what people are getting so hung up on with this one. really, I don’t.

OK you actually looked after i said that. thank you, really. it’s crazy that people are acting like there’s literally no differences. that was just quite weird to me lol. sorry for any confusion on that.

Both being from different angles doesn’t help your case here.

HOSS, THEY ARE DIFFERNT MODELS. There is no “my case” it’s literally factual there’s nothing to get hung up on.