yes but this also affects another tree, which is known for our whining the rest of the player base
it kinda is though
because abrams peaks at 11.3 with IPM1
Might just be the weekend and folks doing stuff. The dev blog, if negative, is gonna revatalize stuff.
Also, best thing everyone can do is go to steam and leave their feelongs there. That is the legal way to voice things.
And who knows… maybe the other communities will see this as a chance to push fixes for themselves as well.
Someone might reach out to the other main folks in the forum.
I don’t think the people playing M1A2T care, as I’m pretty sure it’s an M1A1 SA after all. Correct me if I’m wrong.
1 Like
That’s also fair.
not the other tree I was talking about
theres another sep v3 being added
Oh. Right, I forgot about the British. I’m surprised I haven’t seen much steam from them given how much they talk about Chally. Then again they are probably too focused on Chally, and there isn’t that much of them after all.
I think the issue here is everyone who isnt Russia has some pretty major issues with their tanks armor, modeling, etc.
And the mountain of accepted bug fixes for these issues that never get addressed in the ongiong updates we get.
I want the abrams improved, yes. And moved up, yes. But I also want to see fixes rolled out for EVERY major nations who’s mbts are full of model holes or innacurate armor.
Thats the platform i want the community to rally around.
Cause the push for fixing the challengers fizzled about 2 years ago.
Everyone has just accepted that if your not Germany, Sweden or Russia your free farm and your tanks are garbage.
Believe me it hasn’t. Morvran copy pastes his Chally 2 overhaul essay thing every chance he gets. And other British players will complain about their tree even when it isn’t even close to being relevant.
3 Likes
yeah it felt like half the messages in update discussion were complaining about chally for a while
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I mean I can’t speak for other people, however I myself don’t know what we can really do at least until Gaijin releases their Abrams blog. As of now at best we are just guessing their full reasoning, motives and way of thinking. Which can lead to way to many different outcomes to really predict.
Still too devided for a review bomb to work. ww2 and coldwar ground players aren’t going to care much about what Gaijin does with modern MBTs, most air and naval players aren’t going to care much either. Rando Jimmy with a full time job and a family to take care of who only logs in on WT to play cool looking tanks, blow stuff up and escape life is either not going to care much or isn’t even aware of these things.
The first, and last, succesful review bomb only worked because the issues that triggered it affected nearly everyone.
9 Likes
idk after seeing Gaijin believe that STANAG Rating includes the tracks, side armour, air between instead of the actually ERA. People should realize Gaijin can make up any excuse to deny any improvements for a tank.
12 Likes
I suppose you are an abrams tanker?
I got two questions, and i have no idea if your allowed to answer them but ill ask anyways….
-
Can u tell me if the sep v3 is equipped with gen 3 thermals (IFLIR)
Or is it stuck withe the old gen 2 FLIR?
Many sources online say the sep v3 has the new IFLIR but I don’t know how credible that is. -
Do you have pictures of an sep v3 equipped with TROPHY HV aps?
It’s legit impossible to find one online.
Or are just some few sep v3’s equipped with it?
2 Likes
- No
IFLIR was part of ECP 1B that would have come with M1A2 SEPv4. With SEPv4’s canning, it’ll have to wait till M1E3. Some things like the LWR and new cross wind sensor are supposed to come as modernizations to the SEPv3 at some point, idk when.
and
- No
8 Likes
Last I checked Trophy hasn’t been issued to units with SEPv3s yet, and third gen FLIR was one of the SEPv4 upgrades.
Did anyone find the source gaijin used for the relikt buff?
I’m pretty sure they addressed that in the original post; I only skimmed it though
As far as I know, no. But there may have been docs shared I missed.