i just think its time for gaijin to give us some answers. clearly the “Bug Reporting Manager #1” has some problems with reading comprehension:
all bug report is proving that the extra weight went in the hull too
18 Likes
The dismissive tone sounds a lot like that guy who made the system become anonymous due to his infamous behavior.
21 Likes
Won my bet they didn’t even read the report Lmao,
Gaijin fr is incapable of reading HAHAHAHA
14 Likes
It’s him very probably, literally leaked he never leaved the company despite being stated otherwise :)
10 Likes
This just provides more confirmation on Gaijins upcoming Abrams blog post that they’ve made up their mind on the Abrams armour and nothing will change their beliefs.
“Erm…We Believe…”
“We agree that the V3 has improved armour but no sources indicate that the front hull was improved…”
Why work for free making bug reports when 99.99% of Bug reports are just auto declined if they are for ANY improvements to any non-russian MBT. Actually just roll playing as sisyphus.
16 Likes
@SPANISH_AVENGER we know the contents of the next week address post of the Abrams
“We believe that all the weight went into the turret”
18 Likes
“Yeah, all those extra tons of weight that led to the next evolution program because the tank was getting excessively heavy went to the unpennable cheeks to make them 100mm more unpennable, and yes, it’s still the same 1979 hull from the baseline M1, why?”
20 Likes
My bet is that the entire dev blog will have at least four “We believe”, mostly justifying nonsense, by the way.
Still, they already gatekept the SEPv2 DU hulls based on the prototype procurement, and the promise of the SEPv3 having it improved was implicit since it was postponed for v2s and properly planned for v3s.
Guess they want us to think the american MIC were a bunch of idiots and kept their hull untouched for 35+ years, despite the M1A1HA existing and the aforementioned SEPv2s with their prototype improved DU hull.
18 Likes
85mm* more remember?, not even 150mm plate being actually 150 HAHAHAHHAHA
11 Likes
They are just going to regurgitate bullshit from their previous Abrams Blog post using phony excuses. Expecting anything else from Gaijin is pointless.
4 Likes
It is getting seriously pathetic, im not to keen with reading documents like the ones in the bug report, but even my unprofessional eye can clearly read the stated improvements on hull armor.
9 Likes
It is INSANELY clear he didn’t read it. It’s LITERALLY stated in half the bug report
3 Likes
aint no way they expect people to play the SEPV3 in its current state in DEV lmaoo its a worse sepv2 in every single way and the turret armor is useelesss
2 Likes
What even is the move from here?
Gaijin has just closed their eyes and ears atp
Wait for the upcoming devblog/disclosure.
The comment section will be the move.
yep.
3 Likes
I mean atp are they gonna do anything about it? That blog post is already written long ago and they’re just waiting to release it.
I doubt they’re gonna change anything sadly.
1 Like
I wouldn’t be surprised if the guy that closed this bug report is trickzter…
“all the weight went into the turret”
How do they know? Do they have classified documents?
“None of the sources provided specify what specific changes were made to the Abrams’ armor. We cannot accept a report based on vague data.”
Blatantly asking for classified documents (even though every single piece of publicly available information supports the claim of the hull armor being upgraded)
7 Likes
“I ain’t reading all dat”
I bet the person that denied this report is the same one that denied every report that been created on this matter.
16 Likes
I just looked at it, I was overwhelmed by the amount of info, the fact, THE FACT that the thing closed in under an hour and a half is genuinely applause worthy.
13 Likes