I know these Bug reporting managers have to comb through 100+ reports made per day but this is pure laziness
also use SLM or CAMM cus i can see them closing it again by saying " buk m3 can intercept it cus it has a bigger warhead/proxy range"
sometimes it kinda feels like they are trying to rage bait.
2 Likes
The warhead is obviously the issue which affects all missiles and since the ASTER-30 is ARH instead of IR it misses the target within a 2m radius meaning the fake warhead never triggers which is the whole bug to begin with
This also affects every other missile in the game with a proxy fuse but affects SACLOS and BUK-M3 the least due to player inputs and the BUK-m3s large warhead
I’m going to try and reupload the same bug report one last time using the BUK-M3 as a comparision, if it gets denied one more time i’m done, someone else can report this nonsense
Germany gets one vehicle that doesn’t have it’s full potential: German mains crash out
I don’t think the two situations are comparable
It seems gaijin thinks the seeker on the ASTER 30 is some 1950s pulse tech 💀💀💀
3 Likes
Okay one last go. If the Moderator denies this one I’m over all of this. Community Bug Reporting System
It turns out that the issues section is a joke. No problems can be solved there. They can close your report for all kinds of reasons. The Chinese have proved this point: no problems can be solved in the issues section. You must make a loud enough sound elsewhere.
5 Likes
But they will happily nerf them, just like they nerfed the launch window for the Mavericks.
Bro they literally just said its a duplicate of the denied report
1 Like
The report they link to wasn’t even about Aster (but was accepted).
2 Likes
i find it almost unaaceptable for them to not fix a new vehicle just because the fench players werent loud enought, atleast we have some chance to get multipath esentialy removed acording to this Community Bug Reporting System, wich would be great, but i can see them come up with some dumb reason to do it for the BUK3 aswell since, cant have a russian vehicle be worse hm?
1 Like
MP limit is the same for every missile in war thunder. even for a2a sarh,arh missiles. if they reduce it they will reduce it across the board not just for one system. anything past the 80s can work upto 10-20m.
3 Likes
Duplicate was accepted actually: Community Bug Reporting System
I’ll honestly take the duplicate at least something was accepted
Aster-30 missile does not meet required scenario // Gaijin.net // Issues
Aster-30 should achieve a maximum speed of Mach 5 // Gaijin.net // Issues
Thanks to Mulatu for his sources.
11 Likes
Has anyone reported the fact that they didn’t model lateral thrust?
The missile is designed to be hit-to-kill and lateral thrust greatly helps with that.
I feel that Gaijin should either 1. Model lateral thrust or 2. Adjust the maximum pull/AOA/maneuverability so it acts like it has lateral thrust(increased hit chance)
I wouldn’t even know where to begin with writing a report like that, just curious if anyone has considered trying or has sources etc.
2 Likes
On the Russian dev-stream, they stated that the lateral thrust will come in a later update.
But, it was still reported for now as information on the lateral thrusters were forwarded, such as the lateral thrusters providing 12Gs additional overload. The dart of the Aster itself is 60G. So overall the missile should be able to do 72Gs overload. Would probably be the most maneuverable missile ever seen in the game once they model it, and probably for the foreseeable future.
[DEV] Aster 30 Terminal Dart Incorrect Overload // Gaijin.net // Issues
2 Likes
Thanks to you and others who spend so much time trying to get things fixed 🫡
5 Likes