The Royal Malaysian Air Force Subtree is Coming to War Thunder!

These just really annoy me. It’s one thing to have it added before and just be there, but it’s another to then deny it for the nation it’s supposed to go to.

This also happened to the Merkava Mk.3D and the Finnish KV-1B. Especially for that last one it’s weird because it’d be a much needed techtree heavy tank for the nation.

4 Likes

Yes

5 Likes

Thank you for proving my point :)
What it means is that the faction has lost its identity and specialty. Each nation is meant to have a theme and specialty, and giving them something from every nation doesn’t really help anything and ruins the nation identity.

2 Likes

Its a massive insult to the tree and country to give maybe the best addition possible to a major nation just before formal addition to a minor nation that it fits in and needs the help.

so glad its not happenned here

2 Likes

Ehhh welcome to war thunder, at the same time people are also begging for copy and paste from other nations to buff their nations

2 Likes

unhealthy ecosystem.

  • Players know the most likley additions are the ones that can be spammed across many trees to reduce development man hours so ask for them more often, even though the true nation enjoyers have firm preference for unique stuff over copyslop

  • gaijin takes this as “players only want or are perfectly happy with just copy and paste” so focus on that even more.

2 Likes

What do you mean, jam resistant? 👀

2 Likes

How to create a new sub technology tree? Just copy and paste other countries and modify their basic properties again. Alright, you now have a unique copy and paste sub technology tree. You should also need to purchase its unique copy and paste premium package to quickly get it

2 Likes

Make 30MKM unique. Get rid of Kh-38s, which Malaysia never procured.

3 Likes

this obviously

7 Likes

Just curious on what people would prefer

  • Bolster existing trees with subtrees and one off vehicles
  • Add more independent trees (coalition or solo)
  • Combine all trees into one while removing 1 to 1 copies
0 voters

Historically reliable, there were no APU-170s on the Mig-29N, allowing the RVV-AE to be launched. Therefore, the rockets are hanging in the air on the developers’ word of honor.

4 Likes

IMG_9854

You do have a point

Polish tech tree please

1 Like

If the Su-30SM loses them for the same reason, then I see no issue with this.

1 Like

Can I get a new answer for fixing subtrees?

Also maybe allow multiple answers, because there’s a few great independent tree options as well.

2 Likes

U mean the invisible pylon?

What, you mean that Russian air force never procured them and never used them?

Ctrl + C, Ctrl + V.

4 Likes

Yes, RVV-AE should be suspended on the APU-170, the Mig-29N has only the P-72, which is technically incompatible with RVV-AE.

2 Likes