10kgf or 100N isn’t a big difference
WDYM?!?!?! The whole 40kgf missing is equivalent to 0.34% the empty weight of the plane! The plane could go from a static 1.099 TWR with no fuel to a WHOPPING 1.102 TWR.
This is clearly a game breaking issue worth its weight in gold. The MiG-29SMT will become the best plane in-game if it got the extra 40kgf of thrust its “missing”.
Half my weight of thrust
40? wasn’t it 10 kgf?
Go on a diet then and you’ll get a similar result as the thrust increase :p
20kgf per engine on AB, its still literally nothing, but i figured id be accurate, not that that’ll stop the russian players from flagging the post til its removed xD
yeah just get rid of my legs to improve performance
Bet you’ll notice the legs being gone more than the increase in TWR
Maybe he’s a tall guy. 80 kg is normal for 6 ft+ people
Pretty sure me talking about the thrust and TWR of the RD-33 series 3 is on-topic.
If anyone’s derailing the thread, its you scoping out my comments to have more deranged rants about…
lol did you just call him a nomad?
He roams the forum trying to find posts about USSR
Thats me, the forum nomad, hater of all things USSR, just passing by dont mind my possibly slightly funny sarcastic jokes about russian players crying over 40kgf of thrust for the MiG-29SMT
People should realise that in game 400N isnt going to make any difference. That increase of thrust may give you 1 or 2 maybe 10 km/h more speed but that’s it. It’s not like it’s going to make SMT nimble enough to out rate every jet.