I beg of you get off of forums for Ur own good and for our good as well… 😭😭😭😭
nah
Guy named Tiger_Tank advocating for Rafale to have better missiles? Is it opposite day?
18 Likes
calssics
1 Like
I don’t think you can bomb with MICAs or AIM-120C-5s anyway so what’s the point? The Hammers are right there
3 Likes
Yeah because he probably knows after 2 more updates the rafale is going to be the rafail and get mogged on… J-10C for life!!!
With responses like this, I am also eager for the J-10C to be added as well.
Petition to make jetisonned ordinance explode when they hit the ground with the tnt equivalent of their warhead. Wait i gotta refine this
Petition to make jetisonned ordinance of players in the enemy team explode when they hit the ground (or bases) with the tnt equivalent of their warhead. Players…ahem enemies could use the su33s with full aa loadout and still bomb bases with it. And its not too far fetched to be confident in that quite a lot of them would
To be fair some of those topics are valid
Yes, so easy you’ve never even played it.
well 10-15% of those
like 2 of them
1 Like
Haha, no.
MICA EM / The Rafale already need nerfing or everyone else needs buffing.
If they added MICA NGs (which I don’t think can be fitted to the F3) they’d need to add Meteors and Aim120Ds to everyone else to maintain balance.
As it stands the Rafale needs it’s AAM count reduced from 8 to 6 and have it’s HMD removed
Range is the literally meaningless.
I consider Aim-120C5s some of the weakest ARH missiles in game at the moment. Given that all but the Mica can be defeated trivially by just turning
One of these missiles is not like the others (Meteor). But yeah, MICA NG is not planned for F3
Another one of these flippin threads bro
1 Like
how about you go back to bombing bases or something
5 Likes