And this radar guidance on the Vikhr isn’t mmW, because – as I mentioned before – the Kopyo-25 operates on the 3cm band-wave, not on the mmW. So it would not make sense to remove it if it isn’t as powerfull as the ARH seeker on the brimstone or on the hellfire; plus the fact that it isn’t even FnF. You have to be exposed to fire and guide these vikhrs with the Kopyo-25.
The radar guidance on the Vikhr is kinda of a SARH+DL with its own parameters
And the Vikhr can’t do half of the things a dual seeker brimstone would do, which was the version Gaijin didn’t want to add.
What you think the radar guidance on the vikhr is capable of? Almost nothing because of how botched it is right now in the game.
What isn’t supposed to be added are A-G missiles with an ARH seeker, or you think, making analogies, that a SARH A-A missile is powerful as a ARH A-A missile? Because the Vikhr is like a SARH guided missile; it is powerful as a ARH missile?
You are meaning the decision of Gaijin towards things like the Kh-31A, the ARH seeker on the brimstone or on the AGM-114L, but these weapons are way more powerful than the Vikhr would ever be, even if these changes I proposed – The addition of the Kinzhal-S 8mm band-wave radar and the correction of the Vikhr radar guidance flight path – were to be done.
Gaijin never mentioned the Su-39 and the radar guided Vikhr, as they probably have forgot. They probably also forgot the Khrizantema-S also have radar guidance for it’s missile, though it isn’t working right now.
The Vikhr is an beamriding guidance missile it has no other tracking capabilities. If it is showing other tracking capabilities then it is a bug and will have to be corrected.
The Khrizantema’s missiles can beam ride the radar waves of the mmW radar it has. I don’t have a reason to believe why this would not be possible with the Su-39, specially considering the existence of the Kinzhal-S 8mm wave-band radar.
And again you use names and don’t explain them. How a almost SARH vikhr which don’t have FnF capabilities would be powerful as A-G missiles with a ARH seeker like the brimstone.
I’m asking you to explain “how so”, not to keep repeating the same thing.
So immunity to smoke is the main problem? Seems like your not explaining well enough how alone the “smoke dodging” make it a game breaking weapon as you still will need to be exposed to to any AA, pointing the nose of the Su-39 to the target.
Gaijin said they don’t want missiles with a damned ARH seeker, which is what the dual mode brimstone is, and I can’t see how the radar guidance on the Vikhr use a ARH seeker to be included in this list.
Kopyo-25 is not even a mmW radar, it works on the I-band in-game, which equals 3 centimeter band-wave.
u arent getting in your head that that is not my opinion but that of gajin? its literaly one of the main reasons brimstones were denied because you cant defend against them
they said they dont want missles that ignore smokes as well jesus
You said that Gaijin don’t want missiles with ARH seeker. Whenever you talk about them, you refered to them as “mmW guided ATGM”
Then you mentioned that Gajin declared they won’t add those missiles quoting the brimstones “case”:
So Gaijin was specifically talking about missiles with a ARH seeker, which would be FnF, more accurate than IR counterpats and ignore smoke. The emphasis on “ignoring smoke” is yours, not theirs.
So again: how can a radar guided Vikhr, which don’t have a ARH seeker, have the same power as a brimstone?