same question
i really dont know what i can make out of it for in game purposes
BBCRF is already working on one
2 Likes
hope we get it soon
Would it be even posted?
Theres should be evil grin
The shape and thickness of the point on the taper is incredibly important for the overall performance of the fin. The real world fins are ultra sharp and cost quite a bit to manufacture which contradicts the silly western notion that they do this to cheap out on servo motors for the fins.
Here, by myself or others since the mods banned BBCRF for sharing a document that’s been on google as long as the mods have been alive.
2 Likes
Stuff happened…
Damn, did I miss something again? Was it the R-73E brochure or the Su-30 man.?
Idk
What and where did he post
It does not matter, let us focus on the R-77 so no one shares such a fate.
1 Like
So will you share the bbcrf sims?
Also, as i said before, would be better if we have amrram simualtion as comparision
There already exists AMRAAM aerodynamic simulation from DCS, but BBCRF’s sims were already posted right above…?.. and I just said I would share what he sends us…? So what are you asking?
That wont work well, as different simulations could give different values, not to mention quality of 3d model may also differ. Doing it under same simulation gives us accurate conparisions, even the the face value might be wrong, this could be used to compare in game values between amraam and r77 in term of ratios.
Oh damn, it would be more helpfull if we get drag coefficient / drag VS mach number graph
something i’m noticing is it’s simply the lattice itself and not the whole missile, and again, different sime, different results, can’t hurt to have different sims
because it takes alot of time to calculate complex areodynamic shapes in a simulation
yeah
r-77 at mach 1
r-77 at mach 5
2 Likes
Hmm, less drag at grid fins at higher speed