There is no logic in your messages. It is not written in the books whether there is a loft or not. Just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
Damn you really are stubborn and try to justify anything with any nonsense.
You are telling me that the can R27 loft? Juat because it doesn’t say it doesn’t on the manual?
I can go ahead and say that the Su 27s radar can only lock a target qhen the plane is pulling less than 5Gs. You cannot prove me wrong. On the manual it doesn’t state this.
He does not even know where, when and what Regiment got R-77-1 deployed and does not even know what is different between 77-1 and normal 77
Hoe do you not know it is not the R77-1? You can say aim 120 but which one?
And where does it even say it lofts? Its justa brochure with description. Whats the point in posting just stuff that doesn’t even address the lofting issue. No where I read anything about missing lofting or atleast a description of it climbing to increase the effective range.
I can ago ahead and post a piece of a magazine if you want…Get real

Are you unable to read?
Unlike his, yours would have nothing to do with the topic.
Yeah. The basic aim 7M also has a “special trajectory” through trajectory shaping to increase the energy of the missile at longer range to increase the effectiveness. Yet, it does not loft. Only the MH variants lofts in the classical sense of a huge 30° loft.
Do you have any proof that there is no loft?
Ypu can manually loft any sparrow. F having improved guidance laws and M trajectory shaping and MH same as M + lofting
The difference is that the MH will actually loft for a set amount of time. If you “loft” the Aim 7F/M sparrows at 15°, they’ll climb at 15°. If you launch an MH sparrow at 15°, the MH as it actually has lofting guidance, it will correct itself and climb at 30° regardless of the angle.
Just because they have special guidance laws to increase range doesn’t not imply a straight up loft. A chart was posted with the aerodynamic ranges and the maximum relative range( max relative distance where the missile is farthest from the launching fighter) were shown. The sparrow F figures shown and M sparrow hidden values hidden. Why would they be hidden if they (F/M) have the same motor? Because the special trajectory increases energy thus range. And because some nations still have M sparrow sin their inventories.
Once again, do you have a source that the R-77 does not have a loft?
Moot point, there simply isn’t as it doesn’t exist. Same way you can’t prove the R27 does not loft because the manual doesn’t state anything regarding it. There isn’t one where lofting exists. Special trajectory ≠ loft. You are under the fallacy that conclusion is true because you cant prove it wrong. Can you prove God(abrahamic) or Ra (the egyptian sun goRa )doesn’t exist? To show that something exists, it must be proven. You cannot just say an assumption is true just because yes.
Well, then there is no source. Ie, you can solve both in one direction and in the other as the developer deems.And the developer thought so. Which means your demands are out of place here. Just like you can’t prove that a special trajectory is not a loft
Prove the special trajectory IS a loft then
Lmao
The loft was mastered on the R-33. There is one on the R-77-1. It is logical that it was tested on the previous version i.e. R-77
You are just burying your head in sand. You yourself know that kind of argumentation is completely flawed. The thing is that its just in your interest…simple.
Lmao, I proved it above and clown doesnt read. Special trajectory or trajectory shaping is not a loft. Simple. The Super 530D has aswell “trajectory shaping”, and guess what? It doesn’t loft.
I didn’t see any evidence.
In the same way, you can’t demand to remove the Loft.Because you don’t know if he is or not




