The Pantsir-S1 BR is too low and should be set at 12.7

[rainy2000]

@Mistdevourer

Even 2s6 is better than Ito, that should be 11.0 and not 12.0 …

The only benefits the Tungy has over ITO are its mobility and guns.

Don’t get me wrong, guns and mobility is quite useful, but ITO’s VT1 missiles are significantly better.

[Mistdevourer]

Only if you look at pure stats of missiles, but planes are faster and more agile at 12.0-13.0 than at 10.7-11.7 so in game 2s6 is better than Ito.

Does 2s6 have to counter FnF missiles launched at 15km by Mi28 ans Apaches ? Nope, only slow mavericks that even Ito has some difficulties to see and track.

[rainy2000]

@Mistdevourer

Only if you look at pure stats of missiles, but planes are faster and more agile at 12.0-13.0 than at 10.7-11.7 so in game 2s6 is better than Ito.

Ok, so there’s a difference between saying “2S6 is better than ITO” and “2S6 is better than ITO BR-FOR-BR”.
ITO is better in most cases (other than at close range or against ground targets, where guns and the much better mobility are more important)

2S6 may be better BR-for-BR, which I could agree with.

@Mistdevourer

Does 2s6 have to counter FnF missiles launched at 15km by Mi28 ans Apaches ? Nope, only slow mavericks that even Ito has some difficulties to see and track.

TBF ITO 90M should be 11.7 anyways.