Lol, on the 2PL the mechanism is actually more correct (although misaligned with the actual turret ring):
)))
The turret drives on 2A5+ are Gaijin fabrication basically.
3 Likes
it also may be a perspective working, or that can be a schematic image. With not scale saved
It’s from a manual.
So? How does it interfere?
You can see the mechanism perfectly here.
look pretty similar to me
Ah then i misunderstood, my bad. Then its the same situation devs have with tiger 2s? Similar tanks different module size?
Completely different module models and sizes basically, yes.
2 Likes
that must be changed then, no excuses
Driver-Engine is such a common occurence on these shots that it’s hard to cal it a weakspot nowadays.
3 Likes
Almost never experienced that. Even with 105mm DM33.
My understanding is that the autoloader rotates separately from the turret traverse, but how are the seats that the crew sit on connected to the horizontal drive so they can keep up with the turret? Like there is probably something missing here right?
if all nato tanks have to have russia and china should both have no acception its just not fair game play wise even just on a gameplay stand point if i hit a T90 Ms autoloader and he hits my turret basket my turret is locked in place while he has 1 round left loaded you cant fight back he can freely push you
also all T80 models should catch fire when hit in the autoloader as they have super flammable hydralic fluid which is around the ammo causing it to cook off
1 Like
Yes, the carousel rotates independently, but it is still connected by structural steel to the turret, and if this steel is bent, it could lock up the horizontal traverse.
You definitely have no idea what your talking about spweing nonsense like that lmao
This is how i know you have no idea what your talking about, you absolutely cannot go through upper front plate on the t72b or higher variants
You sure about that?
M900, which IPM and Wolfpack shoot, easilly pens T-64B and T-72B, it only stops at T-80U-ish armor which is also why it cant pen 72B3 or t-90A UFPs.
It’s not especially flammable, it’s MGE-10A with a 96degC flash point, which is a lot higher than diesel that’s usually ~55degC. So while it will burn, it’s fairly hard to ignite, it would really depend on how hot the system gets while working and what exactly is hitting it, a HEAT jet or an APFSDS through the reservoir tank would be a lot more likely to cause a fire than a bit of spall cutting a hose.
While I don’t know what the Abrams uses for hydraulic oil I would imagine this would probably apply to it (and other MBTs) too.
I would prefer the address this by reducing how disabling the basket hit are, rather than making the game even more of a repair simulator, if you add a basket on top of the autoloaders then a single piece of spall inside a Russian/ Chinese MPT will be a minimum 1min 20 sec repair time with a max expert crew if they are the only thing damaged and it’s already at the point you may as well just J-out.
With what shell? As pointed it out starting from M900 all shells that has more than 490mm penetration can easily go through UFP on T-72B.