The MICA EM should have its range fixed due to the addition of AIM-120C-5 in the game on multiple platforms

That’s right, but it means that aircraft can be given these capabilities over time, just to say that there are a lot of things that are limited for some reason. Because if not, the game is completely destroyed

Not to mention that AESA in today’s Warthunder, whether it has it or not, isn’t very important. It’s still very badly implemented.

1 Like

I have it on good authority from a Russian bug-reporter that Su-35 will be even heavier than Su-27SM. So take that into consideration.

Well, I don’t say it’s not enough, I’m only saying it that Optical MAW are far more superior than Rangefinder MAW, that makes Rafale have edge over than EFT again.

Well it’s quite bad for closer engagement, but I agree it’s not completly bad since in longer engagement it still work, IMO BOL Pods only better in Gripen because it has 4 while Typhoon only had 2.

Agree, but that doesn’t make anyone complaining it irrelevant, gatekeeping wouldn’t solve the problem, that’s why I always welcome for any complaint (in each own thread) but not for the cope, Typhoon is underpowered in AtA power, and that thing also need to be considered also.

This is understatement, AESA still pretty good, and don’t get me wrong, if Typhoon already received AESA, it would be way more powerful than Rafale because you could just lob any target and just sit and wait before the missiles reach the target. Especially with manual targeting mode.

It’s going to have better thrust to weight than the 27s but worse thrust to weight than the 27sm. And it will be 19500 kgs. So, much better straight line acceleration, but much more compression

Don’t get me wrong, but do you have any aircraft with AESA?

Yes I do, you can check my War Thunder Profile for my accountability.

Rafale is pretty overpowered in current meta at least in Air RB.

OK, I see, you’ve only got the Rafale. But anyway, as I said, with experience of squadron battles and ground battles, I still have the opinion that both fighters are excellent and have their objectives and I don’t think it’s overpowered at all, it simply does its job better than the Eurofighter, which is more designed for multirole in the game. I think that for you, if you’re interested, it’s about increasing your experiences, getting out of the air realist bubble and perhaps adapting to your way of playing and seeing the game. I just hope you don’t take me the wrong way because if you look at it, you’ve only started with a rafale, it’s simply broken and the eurofighter is weak and now you’re changing, so

1 Like

Does he have an exact number by any chance? I’ve been seeing many sources stating it should be 18600kg or all the way up to 19500kg, as Kizvy mentioned, kinda confusing tbh…

(Talking about empty weight btw)

All he said was about 19t

1 Like

I also have EFT, I understand the pain using EFT in Air RB, but again, if compared to Rafale Vs EFT exclusively, yes it’s underpowered, but in general, EFT still pretty “Stand” against other enemies, especially the British EFT (since Britain always team up with France so guranteed win).

No problem, I just thought you were the sweaty one lol, I take your criticism well since I don’t really play Ground much and only have Britain in Ground Top Tier. I sucks at Ground ngl, that’s why I also said, I can’t argue with you anymore regarding Ground RB.

3 Likes

more like 60° because that’s the radar limit

Yeah I’m overstate it, but you get the point, launching it from gimbal limit.

1 Like

You don’t need to play ground, just try to join the squadron that does squadron battles and play air.

1 Like