The MICA EM should have its range fixed due to the addition of AIM-120C-5 in the game on multiple platforms

Can we go back on topic tho ?

1 Like

Well, you got a compelling point against a buff as a whole.

I still think MICAs should be buffed (and every ARH ungimped), but at least i got to give you that.

2 Likes

Discussing general air balance when y’all are crying about the Rafale being made irrelevant by a new missile is on-topic.

You’re trying to have the MICA buffed for balance reasons after all…

1 Like

fixed*

1 Like

I would actually be supportive of a MICA buff if the Rafale received historical nerfs in other aspects (losing its HMD, 2 missiles, or both). I have always said I preferred that option, as the MICA would be both the best in close range, and top 3 at long ranges with the caveat of somewhat reduced capability sub-20km and/or reduced match impact (or in sim, combat endurance), but the people asking for a historical MICA fix while being violently against any historical Rafale nerf, while the jet is already by far the best one in-game are just asking to have their cake and eat it too, at the expense of everyone else who plays WT.

Not that I really care to get into the HMD or extra missiles debate again, cuz its been talked to death, and wont be changed by gaijin. Its just an additional point to consider when “historical accuracy” is being thrown around as a reason for buffing the MICA.

4 Likes

All you guys talk is "nerfs"and “buffs”. Gripen got its FM changed according to data charts. It’s not “unnerfed” because you guys think so.
I do agree that balance right now isn’t great (I’d argue it’s still better than when f16 and mig29 were introduced with the r27er), but this kind of reasoning will go nowhere.
At least the EFT has pending reports. It’s just a shame that the devs aren’t working on it.
Just like it’s a shame that the MICA does not get historical fixes.
It’s not about “nerfs” or “buffs”, it’s about fixes, and to some extent, I agree, balance

But, on the case of the US teams, they have constantly had at best average win rate even with some of the best aircrafts (F4s, f16s introduction), and usually worse than most.
It’s like Russian ground, its score is quite bad for how dominant the nation is and has been for the past couple years… Obviously, it is not all the US player base skill that is an issue. The f15 is not the best 14.0, far from it. The rafale and EFT both beat it by a significant margin, but the SU30SM is simply not as good.
The problem is that half of the time when I fight US teams I just rip f15 after f15 because they are all in suborbital trajectory and can’t be bothered to notch a MICA from 20km away.

And usually, for the same vehicles, its score are higher than the US using the same vehicles. When the Netz was introduced, it was more than 10% better in general win rate

And that’s exactly a confirmation that different player base have different skill sets.

And considering the plane with MICA has basically the same WR as planes with PL12, I don’t think this is a confirmation that MICA is broken, since we can see that within a singular player base at the same match making, the Mirage 2000-5EI with better FM, apparently broken FM, has the same WR has the J11 with admittedly worse FM but a bit more PL12, that are, if I follow some people, absolute garbage

10 Likes

Rafale maybe but EFF?
only thing EFT beat F-15E is dogfight
Anything else F-15E is better
It faster have more maximum amraam even better radar (due to Gaijin not bother fix captor M)
I don’t see reason why people think EFT beat F-15E to dush even reality it kinda opposite.

F15E needs far more clearance than the EFT to notch ARH missiles, because it’s instantaneous turn rate is dogs hit (specifically the E). Just for that reason alone it’s clearly worse than the Eft in ARB since most engagement distances allow for the EFT to easily notch the missile while the F15 is basically in the NEZ of the missile

6 Likes

True but Typhoon is also flying faster making the missile coming towards it more dangerous lol

Please tell me you’re not saying Typhoon’s speed is a disadvantage here lol.

7 Likes

No, but it is relative the faster you fly the harder it is to defend.
Typhoon flying at mach 1.8 is great and it imparts more energy on your missiles but it also makes missiles fired at you more dangerous.

It’s a balancing act, Typhoon cannot pull 17G like other aircraft. It’s also as mentioned blind with a very poor Radar it is easy to run into jets your Radar has neglected to detect.

1 Like

Now you should ask yourself why the F-15E got the AIM-120C-5 and not the EFT. Yet it’s not problematic for F-15E to get AIM-120C-5 according to @MythicPi

Not necessarily because a slight degree change to the right or left at Mach 1.8 means the missile has to lead much more and thus burn more energy.

You are correct and if we are defending from one missile thats fine…
Multiple missiles launched from different aspects flying too fast wont allow you defend them all.

Which is why Typhoons top speed is a bit of a trap, you need to know when to be fast.

1 Like

Cuz the Typhoon, regardless of how much of a broken mess it is, is still superior to the other current 14.0 jets in flight performance, while being somewhat manageable in the other aspects. It doesn’t hold a candle to the Rafale, but its still performing better than the rest of the 14.0, so may not need the AIM-120C-5 yet.

There are however a few 13.7’s which outperform it stat-wise, like the J-10A, J-11B, and Mirage 2K5F/Ei, and technically, if you average out all the Typhoons air KDR, which is what statshark shows in the pics I posted earlier, you end up with a KDR of 1.03, which would put it well behind the Su-30SM’s 1.18, and around where the most of the other 13.7’s are performing, though I’d rather go with the “best” performing EFT for the sake of throwing y’all a bone.

1 Like

If you put aside the KDR, do you really consider the EFT worse than the J11B and M2K ?

4 Likes

Any reason why you’re not on the Eurofighter/AIM-120C discussion thread and chastising them for asking for AIM-120C-5? I skimmed through it and did not see you commenting on there at all.

Presumably if the Rafale doesn’t need corrected MICA EM, then it also stands that the Eurofighter also doesn’t need AIM-120C-5?

1 Like

Idk about the eurofighter’s fm necessarily, but the gripens fm on launch was a ufo. It simply doesn’t have the engine power to sustain turn the way it was. It was literally accelerating in full 14g turns because the drag was too low.

So basically American mains are so bad that they literally need every handicap in the game

2 Likes

Yes, been like that since the f14 was added

1 Like