not just where it is a game limitation
F15C still has over 1 degree a second too low sustained turn
I think you’ve been forgetting that they have made several attempts to fix the radar and buff it. So it’s not like there hasn’t been efforts in that area.
Yeah, but it might be a game limitation that prevents them from adjusting that. Like the Tornados have WAAAY too much drag at the moment which impacts top speed
its not, they denied a bug report saying it was “close enough” even though there have been flight model fixes for well under 0.5 degree per a second inaccuracies
and how many of those are suggestions for features that arent even close to being modeled in game yet?
Aslo, the Rafale has 6? reports just for a specific thing missing from the HUD. For the Typhoon it was just a “incorrect HUD symbology report”
So that inflates the report count a LOT
Oh right yeah, they like doing that too. Typhoon has multiple of those
It’s also a case of Gaijin are actioning more Rafale reports lets put more in.
I would say a good portion, maybe half of it would be features that are not yet to be modeled in-game. But that just reiterates to developers that the Rafale has a lot of potential so to say. To be fair, some features like firing missiles* outside of its gimbal limits were not a thing in-game until this dev server, so there’s some desire there to see the features implemented on their part.
Right, and if that results in a higher report count which puts pressure on developers to “clear the stack of reports” then that’s just good bug-reporting no? Part of being a bug-reporter isn’t just to submit bug reports and have it be approved but also to do it in a way that increases their likelihood of being implemented.
9 Likes
Perhaps, but still. If we go by severity of reports and not just volume of reports then aircraft like the Typhoon should be at the top of the list. And as we have seen with other vehicles. Like the challenger 2, volume of reports does nothing.
THere is still 50-60 reports outstanding for the Challenger 2s armour alone. Not a single one has been fixed too date.
Air and ground dev teams are different and have different criterias and different priorities when it comes to bug reports.
Come on bro, I don’t want to get very personal, but everytime there’s a request to “Fix” Rafale, there are always a hate for Rafale for getting a better “Treatment”.
Yes, I understand Typhoon is severely underperforming, but guilty trippin on French Bug Reporter doesn’t really help the Typhoon will get any better fix tbh.
This thread again slowly drifitng away from reasoning to fix MICA range.
12 Likes
FIne, buff the MICA EM, the best ARH missile in the game by quite a margin.
But Aim-120C5s for the Typhoon will become required.
Just stupid that the Typhoon asks for Aim-120C5s and its “haha, looks at these guys, giant skill issue”
and the Rafale asks for MICA EM buffs that would put them onpar with the Aim-120C5 and its “100%, must be fixed, look how much the rafale is suffering, we have the most bug reports”
1 Like
Obviously, if MICA-EM get buffed, then AIM-120C-5 also needed for Typhoon, I never against it, I also bumped the request for BOL nerf to be reverted, so I really don’t understand why so much against a historical bug report, it’s like if I against any bug report regarding historical fix for British Aircraft. And nice with your strawman, in fact, keeping with this kind of attack to French Bug Reporter definitely will bump Typhoon issues that never solved by Gaijin up to this day.
A few French mains are probably the reason why we’ve not gotten a single bug report fixed. They have been submitting fake reports that are just causing issues with the main reports. The record was one guy submitted about a dozen for a single area of the Typhoons FM that is still actually underperforming despite a bug report being submitted to buff it 6 months ago (still sat acknowledged)
It should be noted that on the French discord server I have supported and hosted the thread for the Eurofighter to get AIM-120C since yesterday, so saying “what about us” on our threads isn’t conducive nor does it reciprocate the efforts we’ve also put in for you guys.
9 Likes
Did everyone forget about the r77???
I know the guy you refer, but that guy already got what he deserved, he got banned for leaking the sekrit dokuments right? Does this guy would be automatic representation as the whole community of French Bug Reporter consequentially?
Fingers crossed it will.
But im doubting it. US mains are being vocal against the buff.
Just annoying the MICA has gotten a second powerful buff ontop of the fact the Rafale is overperforming so much. But we dont even get basic things like a working EEGS cockpit sight
1 Like
It was more than 1 guy, and every single bug reprot or thing discussed requires a dozen sources and hours of back and fourth to explain and justify even the most basic thing for the Typhoon, usually for a few french mains.
But do the same to the Rafale, you get flagged for being off-topic
Give the Mica EM its extra range but that’s because it should have already had it.
The 120c isn’t necessarily better then the 120b in the dev server:
- When at 5000 feet altitude (at mach 1.2) the 120b is both faster and has more range 5.6 miles more range infact
- When at 16000 the 120c is still slower but has 4.3 mile more range then the 120b
- the only notably larger range is at 33000 feet altitude which is 12.6 miles.
Essentially only use 120C at altitudes over 16000 feet while shooting at a target at or above you, otherwise the 120B is just better.
in reality the best loadout would be a 2 120c 6 120b loadout
most people in air RB are climbing then firing 2-4 missiles before diving and pulling away, those first missiles should be 120c, the rest of the time dogfighting should be 120b because at that altititude the 120b has more range and speed then the 120c
All that to say the 120c-5 is situational based on whether you should use it over a 120b