The M1A2 AIM should be added to the British tech tree

Game Discussion General Discussion
184

One more thing. ->Everything was produced in the United States for the M1A2 Aims. Nothing was made locally in Australia. For the vehicle. So, going by your interpretation of Smin’s words.
Nothing is pointing to it going to the British Tech Tree.

Like, your whole argument is “but Australia used it, and therefore it should go to the British TT.” This entire thread’s argument is nothing but a logical fallacy.

Also, once again, Pakistan has nothing to do with Australia, and you are arguing something completely irrelevant to this thread topic, so I’m not even gonna bother responding to it.

185

If that’s all it is then why are you wasting your time and energy here : )

186

I could say the same thing. To you. :D.

187

You can and I say it’s more healthy for small nations for not to be splitted up across multiple trees and have a HOME

: )

Remember Britain has 16 Australian tech inside of it’s tech tree, how many is outside of Britain, 1 and how many Australian tech are there in total 17.

1 Like
188

So at least that two people withdraw without finding me that rule, 2-0.

189

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/03/u-s-navy-confirms-aim-260a-jatm-testing-is-ongoing/

190

Where’s the rule that says the US is absolutely not allowed to get any of its own stuff?

191

I love how you try and copy me into having the US take an advantage, typical US behaviour that.
When something they see undermine the US they copy it and claim it was there idea all along : )

192

If your going to go on about a rule, why can’t I?

193

It’s not my rule it’s gaijin’s, they want more tech trees to have variety and that does include US exports going to nations

194

Variety just leads them to all be more similar which is a bad thing. They can add variety by adding more British vehicles to Britain

1 Like
195

“Typical US Behavior” XD now you’re assuming Quartas is American? How would you know what is “American behavior”. Bit sad tbh.

196

It isn’t really an assumption. I know he’s from the UK too

1 Like
197

Trust me when I say this, I know several people who always get the question “Where are they from?” yet, since the person asking who is a local doesn’t think they are a local, but are when they are told. It’s rather common tbh. That said, fair enough.

1 Like
198

Oh you’re finally back after that short break, so did you find your rule or went out for a quick smoke ?

199

Hello : )

1 Like
200

I don’t smoke, also that’s off topic. Also, I’m still waiting for you to show me the rule vehicles produced locally in their said country and but is serviced in another country, magically means the country it’s being serviced in should get it.

201

I was at least trying to be kind ; )

Again trying the reversal doesn’t work unless your side has solid prove, that’s all I’m asking is prove.

202

You are asking a question you cannot back up with any proof, so I have no reason to provide any either.
So by all means, I’m still waiting for the argument.

203

These vehicles are marked with a special icon. We’re doing these changes with the aim at improving the structure of the tree, and for the convenience and order when adding various ground vehicles from Great Britain and Commonwealth countries in the future.

After the changes, the MBT line after the Vickers Mk.1 will focus on Commonwealth tanks and export MBTs.

there is my prove, where yours ?

2 Likes