Because you tryna explain the 2.00 2S38 KD vs way lower KD with NATO IFVs / 2.00 IS-3 KD, 2.00 T-54 K/D vs whatever the lower NATO counterpart KD is in comparaison is the result of blind luck on my part and has nothing to do with how good these vehicles are lol
The soviet APHEBC rounds pening an armor while the french counterpart round same mm of pen same caliber can’t pen the said armor, I also made that up ?
The weak spots practically inexistent on IS-3/4M / Object 268 vs the huge weakspots on the NATO heavy counterparts, it’s also completely made up ?
IS-2 lol pening panthers and H1s while the german and US counterparts struggle to pen the UFP of russian heavy and medium, also made up ?
Playing Russia mid tier is easy compared to US or Germany, it’s obvious I experienced it
1 Like
About the same if you compare mbts… better if you cherry pick the 2s38 where you have an 1.2k/s on 30sh games worse if you take a look at your bmp2m which perform worse than your nato ifvs
I think the devs are not counting armor that has fallen off when being hit multiple times around the same area, its mainly visual. I have noticed this on many vehicles for example I shot magach 6 multiple times in exactly the same area and it counts every time that it has explosive reactive armor ,same goes for K1 and K5.
You have like 27 games in it.
Im not saying im the uber player, but i know what im doing, have mostly a pretty aggressive playstile but you have a better K/D in it than me. Lets see after a few hundred games.
And yes, bushmaster IFV’s suck (with some exception), nothing new.
Not about the same lmao, not at all. They’re literally higher than every other NATO vehicles, Leclercs it’s even more obvious
MBTs are not the only vehicles that exist, 2S38 overperform compared to all the other light and IFVs
BMP2M, I use it at 12.3 same lineup with the T-80U and 2S38. I OVER BR them, and still have decent K/Ds with them (except the BMP-2M, because I had to spade it and not using apfsds at 12.3 is hard. It takes time, lot of games)
Talk about the lower tier vehicles as well. Be exhaustive. I overperform in IS-3 T-54 IS-4 SU-100 and so on compared to the NATO counterparts, in K/D, WR, sometimes both
Just be honest when you show people things
1 Like
1.69 on the t80u vs 1.61 on the kvt, cope however you want but that is about the same, specially when you have played it after the kvt, so you would have more experience at the game
As I said, I play for the win, lore, realism and fun only.
I don’t hesitate to stay way behind in a map in a light vehicle or tank destroyer even if there are 0 ennemy the whole game and that I end up with 0 kill bottom of the scoreboard, just because it’s lore and that’s something a light tank or tank destroyer would do.
I don’t play aggressive in very close range like BPA_Jon, I don’t play the game as if it was a COD game. And with all of that, I still have decent K/Ds throughout the BRs
So yes, russian vehicles outperform (I don’t like being lolpened in the turret with my Leclercs).
You compare the KVT belonging to the “dumb” BR bracket where there are pratically only premium players playing dumb every game and ez to kill with T-80U at 12.3 playing in a much harder BR bracket
Of course I’m gonna get a relative better k/d at 10.7 with the kvt compared to the t80u. If it was the M1A2 instead of the KVT, I would have a way lower kd
You realize that most players at 12.3 are also premium players, in fact you will have far more even…
The 10.7 BR (ancient BR speaking, Idk how that changed with the new BR changes) is known to be the braindead BR where everyone play dumb with TURMS / kvt / su-25 / a-10a, it’s well known
At 12.0 (it’s now 12.3 with the new BRs), you encounter the sweaty 12.7-13.0 that have been playing this BR for several years and literrally searched every vehicles in the TT
It’s not comparable, ancient 12.7-13.0 BRs are among the hardest along with mid tier BRs around 7-8
So it’s perfectly normal to have a high kd with a kvt, and not so normal to have the same high kd with a t80u…
Like i said
Sure
You know I’m right. Go try to get a nuke at 13.0, and compare the struggle with 10.7.
Wanna talk about the 5.3 Yak-9K rekting 7.7 heavies too ? Pretty balanced this one too.
Because you arent, they are about the same, not to mention that this hole time that you have been playing with the t80u you were trying to beat a bet…
They’re not, you don’t get CASed every 15 seconds at 10.7.
Literally just said I’m playing for the “win, lore, realism and fun” and not for the k/d at all
Reading a quarter of the post each time, interesting
Sure, you dont get cas at 10.7…
Just another coping mechanism, in reality you were tryharding desperately trying to prove a point…
You know better than me now
Sounds like coping
“You’re saying isn’t good, we’ll take mine instead”
alright
Buddy you were the one that made a bet to get 2 of kd and 60% win rate and failed to do so, and now are youre coping with made up unverifiable excuses
I only accepted a gift and played it because it could help me grind the russian TT, you think I’m a nolife like you sweating on a videogame which in addition of that aims to be a sim war and not a COD like videogame at all ?
You gonna stay on the thread all day long answering each one of my post just to get the last word bud ? Sounds like you’re the tryharder here, nothing better to do I’m guessing
