Dunning Kruger has a great theory about something.
Being skilled in one thing, then making claims about other things loosely related to that one thing.
I ain’t gonna say anyone here is that, but you’re free to interpret that there might be someone here that is.
1 Like
Seriously, if you want to boast about how good of a player you are, which is fine by me, consider creating a new topic along the lines of « the Leclerc is the best tank in game and I can prove it as the best war thunder player ».
This topic relates to historical inaccuracies, as well as the average top tier french player struggling to find any relevant advantages of the Leclerc against all other top tier MBTs, aside from maybe the Ariete and the challenger 2. And, on your side, you’ve done nothing but boast your stats, talk about lineups such as the mirage 2000, and give flawed stats. None of which, even if accurate, are actually on topic, and this has gone for about 60 messages back and forth, which is pretty annoying.
7 Likes
I never did you people kept bringing it up stop the cap
its just one of the ways its naturally sorted this is what it looks like when you go by specific br
2 Likes
Damn, saw a bunch of activity here thinking something might’ve been changed ingame for the Leclerc.
Oh well.
3 Likes
ya it got my hopes up aswell
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/mdod9tP0jyX5
Now, L27 report is acknowledge if apply to in game
Leclerc have WORST firepower in war thunder
I’m disgusted by Gaijin france TT hatred
4 Likes
leclerc need DM53(like ariete) or SHARD
1 Like
I doubt that will happen, there is no way Britain developed a round with better performance that 3BM60 or OFL 120 F1 starting with a subpar cannon and ammo design (2 parts ammo)
For comparison, DM63 has around 720mm when fired from the L/44 and that’s one of the best penetrators currently in existence.
only other option other than Shard Mk1 is really ofle f2 but i don’t know any info on it
Can you get the difference between kills and deaths of the tank with this?
No one has ever said it was about the entire french TT, the topic is focused on the caracteristics of the Leclerc specifically.
While I don’t disagree with this topic in general you are vastly undererstimating autoloaders.
The Leopards and Abrams can only achieve 6 seconds with an ace crew (some 900< battles usually without spending GE) while max lvl expert is 6.7 and every hit that harms your crew makes it worse.
6.4
1 Like
The Leclerc’s autoloader is marginally better than the BVM’s and is 2 seconds slower than the Japanese tanks.
Autoloading is best when there’s multiple tanks in an engagement. In a pitched battle it’s mostly irrelevant as you’re pulling in and out of cover based on your reload with the enemy not able to engage you while your reload finishes.
2 Likes
Ah yes, intending to correct the stats of an MBT (which is worse than it’s counterparts in many ways) to make it better is a skill issue. That makes sense
No, it’ll be tied with Strv 122, T-80BVM, & T-72B3 for “worst”.
What do you mean BVM, 122 and B3 round all have wonderful spalling, you don’t really need insane penetration but rather than that you need good spalling.
Spalling is a relation of penetration & armor thickness & type to my knowledge, at least in-game. IRL there are more materials differences than what WT can simulate.
In what way are they the worst ? They all got better penetration
They have identical penetration within a few mm.
666mm for 3BM60.
662 for OFL 120 F1.
678 for m/95/M322.
“LOS 100 meters” 60 degrees.