The Leclerc is in dire need of a buff

Hello.

I have to rewrite the report when I do have time, sadly as outlined the report actualy contains different issues and needs to be separate. If every goes well in this days I should rewrite it.

11 Likes

and the usual people will label it " not a bug "

just like the stinger 22 g .

3 Likes

Mistral and Stinger is another issue in and of itself. Roldand elevation is just a bug that devs aren’t willing to go through. for some reason

1 Like

The mistral is worse than the stinger in my experience. It could be distracted by a cigarette thrown from the cockpit let alone flares.

4 Likes

I’m speaking in terms of why do the devs not fix the issue, not how it performs in game, but yeah, you are also correct here

2 Likes

They definitely need to rework some of the helicopters IR signatures. 1.5km lock range on snow maps make absolutely no sense, the cooled IR seeker is already operating in below zero temperatures making it more sensitive… Meanwhile the only heat signature for 10km is the helicopter… Yet it can’t see it.

4 Likes

@DELTACLUSTER about Leclerc GALIX,

Spoiler


immagine

Cartridge Model still need some minor correction but now it is consistent between variants and stick out a bit less.

12 Likes

Will we ever see anything regarding the Leclerc AZUR’s still absent LWS?

As of right now it’s undoubtedly the worst Leclerc variant with pratically nothing going for it.

It’s the slowest of the 4 and the armor that makes it so slow is completely useless in 99% of engagements (lol).

There simply isn’t any reason I can think of that anyone would ever chose the AZUR over the S1,S2, or S21 besides maybe lineup filler if you have enough slots.

8 Likes

I use it because it is my favourite looking. I still cry trying to play it, but that’s another reason to use it.

5 Likes

Hello. There is a report open about it and Developers will take a look when possible.

4 Likes

Is the report labelled ‘bug report’ or simply suggestion?

Lovely. Big thank you!

1 Like

Is this source credible enough to improve the Santals missiles ? Looks to be the manufactures brochure, seems we are missing explosive mass, range and top speed, I wouldn’t bother asking for 30g it’d only get denied anyway.
https://www.mbda-systems.com/?action=force-download-attachment&attachment_id=17900



https://web.archive.org/web/20211108232400/https://www.mbda-systems.com/?action=force-download-attachment&attachment_id=17900

4 Likes

Second to that is seems the ATAM is missing its proxy fuse and explosive mass.


3 Likes

30G would refer to a later variant of the mistral, either 2 or 3. The santal itself is using mistral 1 with advertised primary source giving it 24G

Huh ? The mistral is in a very poor state in many different way, but proximity fuse and explosive mass I’ve never heard/seen any issue about it

Currently in game it’s 1.11kg and the air to air version doesn’t seem to have a proxy fuse in game.

You’d need to test the proximity fuse, because for me it’s working

There’s nothing stated on the stat card about it having a trigger radius for a proxy fuse, it seems to only be contact.


according to the datamined missile stats spreadsheet they do have a proxy happily, and I trust it on this aspect, but still it’s still undeniable that the mistrals underperform tremendously.

2 Likes