The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

When M can be modernized or modular it’s pretty bad

Still less overlap than M1

2 Likes

At least the M means model Everytime lol.

Also if you look at the full naming system it’s very clear, like Tank, Combat, Full-tracked, 120mm gun, M1

1 Like

atleast it had its weapons and radar set

can yall get back on topic

2 Likes

nyet

He’s right, I don’t want this goldmine to be deleted by mods.

5 Likes

I’m literally about to get them on the F-15, but I don’t usually play top tier as much as 6.3 - 9.3 because top tier is pure cancer no matter what team you play. CAS makes top tier ground suffer, as 3-4 people spawn in planes and then it’s raining brimstones, KH-38s, AGMs etc.

Or the pixel shot cheaters, man, those are my fav. Getting shot through 16 bushes, 5 trees, over a ridge, but someone who snaps to me like they got X-ray vision 😂

Isn’t the Zestorer and Kugleblits fake?

some of them just might looking at the ban list size.

1 Like

Isn’t the S-25 the massive dumb fire rocket the Su-25s get? Or am I miss- remembering?

Su-17/22, Su-24, Su-25, Su-27/J-11, Su-30 and Su-34 get it

1 Like

it did exist, but it wasnt called the zerstorer

existed fully

I was saying the AGM is slower… not the MT, but please continue to interpret my words in manners you know I do not construe.

I have seen brimstones be far more effective than KHs many times over. In fact I’ve witnessed 2 brimstone carrying aircraft get a nuke…

Hate to break it to you, carrying 1 or all KH-38s make your SP cost max immediately.

Oooh more insults because your annoyed, great, anything new?

Are you going to purposely change my words again and lie?

Ooop I guess I’ve never played USA, Germany, Italy, or anyone else for top tier. You can literally look at my profile dude, I have top tier for both the USA and Italy, and pretty much have it for Germany, Sweden, and I’m currently working on France.
I’ve almost spaded the whole of Russia and Italy.

No, Mythic interpreted your sentence correctly, that’s what you said, even if you didn’t intent to. The KH38 and AGM-65 would have to swap places in the sentence to get the meaning you wanted.

1 Like

Re-read it.

The things a KH-38 will kill is the same thing an AGM-65 will but slower.

The things a KH-38 will kill is the same thing an AGM-65 ← (now the subject, instead of KH) will but slower.

Also, don’t take what Mythic has said to heart, he’s been changing my words when quoting me, to say different messages. So he’s being very deceptive.

1 Like

Depends, Merkava Mk.4s can give 65Ds some serious problems depending on the angle while Kh38s will pretty much always one shot them.

1 Like

this is read as KH38 being able to kill the same things as mav but KH38 is slower

no, as properties of mav were used in comparison to KH38 the KH38 is still the subject

1 Like

yes Mythic’s interpretation on that one is correct

And that statement is wrong anyway. 3x AGM 65 won’t kill a SPAA that is on the watch, but 3 KH will

AGM 65 won’t kill someone through a smoke, but KH will

2x to 3x slower is also a big difference. A 10s vs 30s flight time can make a lot of difference. in the additional 20s it takes for an AGM65, your target can get into cover (sometimes accidentally), get killed by a team mate, smoke (even accidentally), or the enemy AA had enough time to take down every single AGM thrown. So many things that make the success rate lower

8 Likes

Not how English grammar works.

I don’t need to, I’ve read every message in this thread.

He really isn’t

4 Likes