The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
,
9317

which are stupid because if anything an EC RB with heavy focus on AI target that has to be destroyed to win the match will make the weapon sees better use similar to it’s IRL implementation. it’s already stupid that the way to enjoy CAS armament is limited to bombing castrated tank column and VERY outdated emplacement stretched in a 1914 trech war configuration, now they want to limit the use of A2G ordinance to GRB only if you want it to be useful.

They have ground AI, they can make them duking it out like in Arcade Assault, why not do that but for RB EC, make the SPAA target plane, implement more SAM emplacement, and actually make a game mode that uses EVERYTHING the damn plane got?

Like, at this point, only thing useful for ARB is napalm, dumb bomb and occasional massive guided bomb to bomb base in very high tier ARB. Expand the damn game mode so I can actually use GBU-12 and Mavericks on enemy armour and key emplacement without restricting it usage to 8km box against goddamn leopard again.

9318

Yes, because it was used earlier in the thread. Hence the again.

9319

i missread i thought you said “or I’ll have to …”

9320

Im “borrowing” that

1 Like
9321

It’s highly advised to stop using profanities, bringing in politics and going at each other’s throat before punishment is handed out.

If the topic at hand needs further discussion you can take it to PMs as it’s going off-topic.

3 Likes
9322

An official response from Gaijin would end the thread.

2 Likes
9323

No it wouldn’t.

9324

If people want things taken seriously in the first place, then Civilized Feedback is the best coarse of action and more helpful for Staff…

1 Like
9325

8000 posts later with no response, you guys can not blame users for being upset at this point

3 Likes
9326

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

9327

Sure if it was free to play it would be a different scenario. Many people including myself have some coin into this game.

9328

it is

1 Like
9329

There have been multiple Game masters and Technical moderators actively engaging with the conversation such as @Gunjob and @Necronomica. We’re talking from the very start of it.

We’ve been discussing with you about the seeker head from the message that I’ve left here above.

1 Like
9330

CMs / Admins / Dev Staff will be reading and sending feedback at any stage… they do not really need to show them selves

But… it can be locked if it does not remain on topic and civilized…

9331

Which of those people are actually employed by gaijn though? I know gunjob isn’t and is a technical moderator. Is Necronomica actually a gaijin employee?

9332

Still not explained that MT was real or even exist so it no use not even a picture carry by aircraft

Same as what i said above

9333

We’re all volunteers.

This point still stands.

2 Likes
9334

Yes you and other moderators and technical moderators have been active in this post but we haven’t had an official response yet. What is the point of continuing this thread with no actual feedback from the Devs? Has there been an official response in the last 8300 posts since it’s been created?

1 Like
9335

and none of them have been able to explain why a likely fake missile is in the game

3 Likes
9336
1 Like