probably because the AGM65 is the most common AGM across the trees in game and is in the middle of the pack for strength of AGMs atm
2 Likes
Ok, some sort of unwritten rule?
Because it’s the baseline that most nations currently use. It’s also a reasonable level of balance. But if you want to balance around KH-38MT then that’s fine, but that does mean we need MMW Brimstone 2s for the Typhoon, GBU-53s for the US, etc
7 Likes
This is such cope again.
He could have easy dealt with the second pantsir in the first run, but he himself fked it up.
Also as he stated, the flat map in this case makes it harder, but still easy to clap them.
And then the whining, muhhh SU30 has free game and doesn’t have to worry about SPAA, while he literally kills him 2 seconds later and the SU30 gets a wopping 3 kills. While he gets 6 ground kills and 2 plane kills and only died because he couldn’t manage his fuel, truely suffering.
1 Like
Missing the point. I’m asking that the Kh-38MT needs to be removed entirely and replaced because there’s no really good way on balancing it.
Except for the fact they are somewhat balanced at their BR and can be further balanced in the future if need be.
Are you saying that the SM3 and the Su34 is balanced? That’s a crazy statement to say
Explain to me why replacing the Kh38 entirely, replacing it with the Kh-59, is a bad idea? It’s pretty much a Hammer.
I’m still baffled that people are blatantly defending the Kh38.
6 Likes
so what im hearing is the Su30 pilot wasnt aware of his surroundings (not surprising) and died totally means the Su30 is balanced and not that its a bad pilot, you also act like what he did in the video was easy which if it is im sure Su30s and Su34s could also do this with MLs so what is it, that this took a decent bit of skill or that this is easy and Su30 and Su34s should also be able to do this?
5 Likes
answer: russian mains that dont like the idea of having to have a tiny amount of skill to get kills
9 Likes
I didn’t know there was a baseline for weapons, it’s something totally made up, at least in this case.
In that case, as AGMs dont need to be balanced against each other. MMW Spear-3s here we come
6 Likes
Damn these Russian mains are still dragging this topic.
Here’s a good option for it to not get removed (which i highly doubt considering Gaijin favors Russia alot): add Pantsir to every single nation that lacks proper SPAA, problem solved.
1 Like
Ive read this thread every day, theres virtually no one defending it.
eh there are a couple lol such as ghost and montorola
Yea, calling out whining is defending it, sure bro.
And they get shit on hard for it, its not a big deal. Its not like there is a brigade of russian mains here defending it like people are saying.
Honestly I wish I could visit a different timeline where the kh38mt was an american missile to see what this thread would look like.
2 Likes
You guys have been constantly bringing the thread off topic and have brought literally nothing of value to the discussion, with no new information or even any information of any worth period regarding the question of the Kh-38MTs operational existence.
You aren’t calling out whining, you’re derailing the thread because you want to continue to abuse a missile whose existence is at best dubious, and is blatantly overpowered and problematic to boot.
The vast majority of the replies to this thread are due to arguments started by pro-russian players either stating off-topic things, or just blatantly lying. On one hand, I have to thank you guys for keeping this thread alive while the devs try their best to kill it by ignoring the entire situation. On the other, you guys are the main reason why this thread has little of value being discussed in the comments, with the other half of the blame being attributed to the fact that it seems like I’ve already dug up all possible public info on the missile and nobody has been able to find much else to discuss since the works already been done.
Please stop starting off topic arguments.
Edit: Looks like there’s an abuse of the flagging system going on again
19 Likes
Its the most common and the baseline agm in the game. What else are you going to use as standard
There’s clearly a way to balance it by just strapping it on planes that are bad in other areas.
So now you’ve conveniently switched from talking about a single metric in particular (missiles in this case), to talking about vehicles as a whole when it comes to “balance”.
Having all-aspect missiles at the BR range in which most other planes (sometimes even flareless) get pretty poor rear-aspect ones is a major problem, that is if you use the flawed reasoning in which only one of the vehicle’s metrics is being compared.
Are they not balanced for their BR ?
Please enlighten me.
Ah yeah, not a single piece of blame should go to the “good” guys when it comes to off topic. I’ve seen countless of posts about something pretty off-topic like 65Ds vs Brimstones, that actually got started by people who want 38MT gone lol.
Also, replying to off-topic with more off-topic is not a good idea, I thought you as a OP should know that.
1 Like
I lost several Tiger UHT helis to KH-38 slingers. Once fired you can’t do anything. With that agressive lofting you can’t even hide behind a bulding. Your heli is doomed. Thx for added this, Gajin.
1 Like
It would probably be real then