Like WT wiki or actual wikipedia? i might go fix the actual one.
?
It definitely had an RWR as nothing Sent to Vietnam lacked one, or was refitted with one as soon as possible. The ALE-40 dispensers are a fabrication though.
And there was about a month of overlap between the AIM-9E being sent to SEA and the F-5C’s being handed over to the RVNAF, as per the dates listed in the CHECO report for COMBAT SNAP (introduction of the AIM-9J), so they at very least are contemporaneous, at very least.
Also the AIM-9E was provided to the RVNAF in small numbers, so even so those F-5A (“F-5C”) airframes were handed over (around ?'67?), they were modified to receive the AIM-9E while in service.
Defense Attache Saigon: RVNAF Quarterly Assessment, 4th Quarter FY 73
“The current AIM-9 inventory is made up of B model missiles. Forty each F-5 aircraft are now being modified to provide AIM-9E capability. Estimated completion date 17 Aug 73. We have 48 each E Missiles authorized. However, only 24 each will be called forward”
~~
“It is anticipated that 9E operational capability will be attained on or about 17 Aug 73”.
2 Likes
next thing he is gonna say is that it didnt had landing gear
1 Like
Again, not the standard the Gaijin uses.
Please provide an image or other source that references the Kh-38MT specifically; being mounted on any of the airframes that have it in game, let alone those particular versions of the airframe.
And if those aren’t going to be the standards going forward there’s ordnance that could be introduced in and around the 9.0~11.0 range that would make things real fun for anyone not on the US team.
15 Likes
Gotta save that before gayjin deletes it
It’s the standard I use 😏
splendid news
country claims to have built weapon perfect for a specific task in a war.
weapon has not appeared in any circumstances not even another press release to pile on more lies.
don’t worry guys they are just waiting for when its needed and its totally not fake
15 Likes
Haha
1 Like
Double standards
Also mention of 9E, B and maybe J they have incorrect maximum g overload
Well if we are going to be fair.
Russia never claimed the weapon being capable of what it can in game. Gaijin is just using their interpretation of what they think it should be. Which looking at technology development of other aspects in their military it’s a very generous interpretation.
They are applying US budget and MIC to Russian military lol
i wonder what they are planning
im new to the thread, im also trying to find proof but seems like a nothingburger
1 Like
It appears to be the case of attaching Western aspects to a nation that hasn’t even had a TGP for longer then 10 years.
1 Like
Staff restored our posts. Whoever that was, thank you
And yet even after the sanctions we have to still use russian rocket engines because NASA cant get it together. Unlimited funding doesnt neccesarly mean a better product.
Its not 1990 anymore even china is starting to pull ahead of us in certain areas.
Something new or only spam about nothing?
Gaijin standards are fake, they change whenever they want to better fit what gaijin want. They aren’t even written in some documents, we know those “standards” only from CM messages. You won’t even know about them if you don’t live on forum.
5000 messages of cope that gaijin have to provide something to players, when in fact gaijin never had to provide or prove anything, they don’t care and can do whatever they want as they do for a decade already with a ton of fantasy stuff being in game. Kh-38MT is not even the fakest thing (by what people think about it’s non existence here) compared to other stuff in game.
6 Likes