I know this is off topic but i love the loki show
tried for a little bit but im going to be honest i had a gut feeling it wasnt real the whole time i was searching
whole thing just felt off, there was no news at all about IR seeker tests for it
2 Likes
yeah I didnt have the patience to look for more than a couple hours with how repetitive it was
1 Like
Well i saw the brochures and the mock-up and was like ok. Something could be there. It’s not like it is unreasonable to think they could build an IIR seeker I knew no shot it was anything like the seeker in game even if it were real the model in game is definitely over preforming in quality seeker optics.
1 Like
If it was real Gaijin would have come here or make a statement to prove it on our face by now
But they seem fall silent
I suspect that they just waiting to this thread to die down
or just ignore it on purpose because don’t wanna face humiliation and backlash.
3 Likes
it would make sense to announce tests for potential customers though.
1 Like
Guys we are here to make sure everyone is following the rules not to prove you right or wrong.
On that note please stay on topic I am starting to run out of coffee.
10 Likes
21 Likes
Have you thought of moving to harder stuff?
That was my 3rd round of research, I think I’m gonna call it at that because it honestly just sucks to go around in circles every time 😓
1 Like
literally the only mention I have seen for testing was from some random blog linked here and it said they hadnt finished testing but gave an expected date
that easily coudlve been for the overall Kh-38M family, some of which do exist
iirc it did specify MT but did not seem reliable at all
I didn’t see anything list MT in specific for testing other than just forum user word. Not anything from a document or news source.
1 Like
I don’t think Gaijin works like that.
They’ve denied many vehicles for being fictional or because they lacked evidence, but they still ended up adding fake vehicles when they seem fit.
yeah, it was some random forum/blog post
1 Like
if u ever so think it exist then prove it
which u wont and u cant and u would derail the thread again
Your post is contributing a lot in the search for sources that indicate if the KH-38MT is real or not. Complaining about derailing, antagonizing and disrupting while doing exactly that is pretty rich.
The vast majority of posts aren’t claiming the “KH-38MT is definitely real”, the discussions have mostly been about balance and weapon systems in general. If this thread was limited to on topic posts dedicated to finding sources of how real the KH-38MT is it’d have less than a hundred posts. Your criticism about who’s responsible for most off topic posts is incredibly one sided. You can probably find ten “the KH-38MT ruins top tier” complaints for every post actually claiming that the thing is real and should stay because of that.
Also “they should just provide sources” is far too simplistic unless you think someone is just sitting on those. It takes time for word of mouth to get around to people that might actually have said information (especially since a pretty significant language barrier is involved here), or to request information from third parties, or to request documents from archives and so on. People have been going over the Begleitpanzer for a good four years or so at this point. It’s not a fast process.
Hey! Here’s one now.
Then what in the WORLD are you doing if not the same exact thing? By your own definition, you’re a hypocrite.
6 Likes
I pointed out your double standard. It’s also just off topic, while your post I replied to is derailing and antagonizing on top of that.
1 Like