This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Prove they’ve been combined. Until you do so, yes, it’s very logical that the MT variant does not exist, in fact that’s the default explanation, and you can cope all you want, but it will stay that way til ANY OF YOU can FINALLY prove that the MT variant exists.
a mock up nice, that doesnt prove anything
Facepalm
prove that that is a real seeker
given the missile is labeled Kh-38ME im pretty sure its supposed to be a nondescript fake seeker
ok fine, AIM-54 seeker
which they fail to do so
only yap
zero evidence
zero logical arguement
zero “maybe I am wrong”
100% “iz riel bvro”
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Aim-120 178mm. Aim-54 380mm
Kh-38MT 310mm Case Kh-38 310mm
utterly meaningless, AIM-9B and AIM-9X have same diameter but are vastly different
Can you please post a video of Kh-38MT test fireing? or a full report on the results of a Kh-38MT test fire with the IR seeker used
that’s the whole point of this thread. Nobody seems to know ANYTHING about this missile. Not the people who aim to remove it from the game nor the ones who eagerly strive to keep it. So you answer my question: Why should it not get removed and replaced with sth we have actual info about?
they’re not modular.
prove that they are not modular kekw
because they are the same missile that has different function and there are no proof of KH-38MT being functional hence its not real
and mockups dont proof anything because anyone can just 3d model it, buy material, 3d printed or make it and you have a mock up
if i have money and time i can literally mock up a su-75 out of paper and i can say “itz riel bvro yu trolin”
These videos are off-limits and no one will share them.
you mean they dont exist?
send it to mods for confirmation
which i doubt you will because you dont have them and 38mt defenders has said the same thing and none of them did it
cool so no proof. Good to know
send them to are us via discord, we wont post them here, but we will confirm