nearly 3000 messages, still no proof
6 Likes
its almost like it doesnt exist…
5 Likes
Its unclear what the 38MT can and cant engage target-wise considering we cant even conclusively prove the thing exists in the first place.
As for the AASM, its not 100% garanteed it cant hit moving targets, but the belief of this is rooted in how the seeker works, as has been discussed in the appropriate threads, but short-form, basically it doesnt “track” a target, it “finds” the target in a predesignated area and updates its guidance coordinates twice. Sorta like its trying to hit a target using pictures instead of a video feed.
As for the Kh-29’s, idk much about them, so I cant really comment there sorry.
Just because you don’t see something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.The Kh-38 platform itself has been around for over 10 years
I have to say it’s funny how disingenuous you are sometimes. Several sources have been shown to you. Gunjob even shared you an excerpt showing that the French claim that even if difficult they managed to target threats going under 50kph in the German discord, and yet here you are again lol
To begin with, the Su-25SM3 cannot use the kh-38 at all, but Gaijin simply ignored it.
1 Like
The Kh-38ML and MT use the same AKU-58 pylon.
If you bothered reading what gunjob said, he’s not sure if the actual source is talking about AASM IR or AASM laser, since tge french players have a nasty habit of croping the source to lie, and the excerpt said “it is really very hard to shoot a mobile target”, which isnt exactly glowing praise regarding the capability. If you wanna argue about it tho, take it to the appropriate thread instead of derailing this one just to be petty
1 Like
Tell me when it stopped the Gaijin if the weapon or plane wasn’t fully functional. The Yak-141 is an example of this
Right, so you finally admit the Kh-38MT likely isnt a real or fully functional? Cool, thanks man :)
Only for the russians
That’s kind of logic that would make this game much more fun for everyone. For everyone except soviets.
Kh-38MT and Su-30SM have nothing to do with Yak-141, Ho-229, and Kikka.
I didn’t say that.
E-100, P2, Ho-229 and etc
So from what I understand, kh38mt has a mockup, the seeker is presumably real. But no evidence of it being used?
Yes you’re right
But also the seeker is another problem if it works on moving targets?
there is no information about the seeker on the web, only patents
to make a claim like this you should back it up by showing a picture of Kh-38MT on an AKU-58 pylon