any proof?
It is absolutely possible for mock weapons to be fitted to or even flown on an aircraft.
12 Likes
I know it’s KH-38ML. I’m agreeing with him that a similar picture of the 38MT is about the only thing that would prove its existence to me. And I’m pointing out that frankly it’s a pretty low bar to make(and pretty easy to get a picture like this TBH) given how much more evidence there is for many more munitions that aren’t in-game for some reason.
Could just as easily be any base in Russia for a training sortie.
EAP mentioned
Smin is on his way.
8 Likes
Reposting this because it’s clearly an MT, by the seeker angle (Not looking straight, slightly angled down, like seen on the mockup) and the wings
I might be wrong on this but those don’t look the same to me. The one in the brochure seem to have an actual seeker, by the way it’s reflective.
That’s probably just the different lighting conditions and the dull seeker optic window being polished to look nicer when the missile is in front of potential buyers. Both the confirmed mockup and the potentially mounted mockup have dark tinted windows over their seeker.
It may be just that the sun makes the highlight sharper, or the makers of the mockup decided to snap a photo of their current missile projects before finishing up on the KH-38MTE with a bit of polishing for the seeker window. Either way it’s not particularly difficult to change a dark tinted matte window into a dark tinted polished window.
Heck, with enough effort you can polish a ball of mud to reflect light like a brown mirror.
Wouldn’t be the first time a mockup seeker was used.
7 Likes
I do not mean it in a rude way, but you can see a seeker there? Among the pixels all I can see is a black surface that reflects sunlight and is lighted up by the scan.
Just meant that it is more reflective than the one of the mockup image, not that I can tell if it has an actual seeker
It’s like trying to see the guidance head of an R-73 at a distance equal to 1-3 aircraft in poor lighting conditions.
guess Gaijin did take notice of this thread. Lets see what they have to say (if the leeks are true)
if they did they shouldnt change kh38 but REMOVE IT
even nerfed this weapon has no right to be in the game
4 Likes
Its most likely a buff to 70km range I’d guess. The better GBAD being added and the fact they refuse to publicly acknowledge the thread suggests that.
2 Likes
one can at least hope ;*(
The lack of AASM Hammer changes suggest it also means no changes to the IR seeker range (if it was proven to function similarly at least).
1 Like
I should go and bug gaijin about them accepting mockup weapons…… :)))))
Smins going to have to ready the ban hammer
3 Likes
Yes, that’s why they’re changing KH-29s as well.
Probably a buff to range if anything, Kh-38 claims a max stand off distance of 70km. With the new AA coming Gaijin will do anything to give Russia the competitive edge.
3 Likes