yeah but 38mt is beyond balance rn
so they really need to nerf it
since they dont have any data on it either, just base it off the current brochure, with speed, drags, zoom and thermal sight generation
what would be fair is that 12x 2nd gen zoom with higher drag coefficient and remove IOG
it would still be better than any other IR agm but now more balance(would still be busted probably, but better than nothing)
also i doubt they would limit it to su-34 only, as there isnt any proof of su-30sm fielding kh-38 either, only kh-29 ive seen so far
they wont say that though, they will just give a very high price and say delivery in 3-4 years betting that they will be able to finish it in that timeframe and charge enough to open an assembly line
Generally im of the opinion of remove it.
And almost every other plane, weapon and tank that wasnt actually real e.g the f16aj
Kikka
As well as rebalance the things like that of the m26 which is artifically nerfed through both pen values and velocity
f16aj i mean sure but kikka? idk about that but i digress
never!
Your type was all lurking to rubber stamp its existence, thank god you know have a single photo of something resembling it on a plane!
Now you dont have to do anything, if only this same half baked logic applied to the A-10Cs Mavs or MMW Brimstones.
Never had its guns fitted IRL theres a possibility they may never have fitted and functioned.
Por que
alllmost 8k messages, have you guys found proof of kh’s existence yet
Not hide nor hair lf it sir
i mean that doesnt disqualified it from having guns, kikka is basically me262 but licensed with minor changes, and base on how most planes ended up it would make sense to have gun, more or less. The operational design definitely included provisions for armament, especially to function as an interceptor properly and there was no air to air missiles
same with things like cf-105, envision to have guns on production but never fitted cuz it was cut
cuz compression
and gaizin, gaizin never do decompression
Thats irrelevant to its pen being absolutely shafted.
It never fully existed as well like i said it never had guns mounted into it.
The issue is with it that it same as the KH38 cant be proven against or for bar on extemely circumstancial sources, aameas kh38mt.
Got a source for that? Most sources were destroyed before the US got to it as far as im aware.
And much like this, and yak141 they should not be in the game.
tbf i would go find it but say this, you use common sense, you dont design an aircraft with absolutely 0 arnaments, especially an interceptor in WW2, and its japan, it flown once, japan surrendered, oof the plane. The purpose of it was to strike B29, i dont think you would design an early jet to banzai into the bomber
why shouldnt the cf-105 be ingame
yak 141 did fly and did have gun installed, however weapon capability was never tested, but given Gaizin do things, id let it pass, since how would u balance things like that and most prototype vehicle usually land in a difficult spot between not added and not balanced properly
Again it never functionally flew with armerments that we know or with a credible source.
Exactly the same argument to remove the kh38mt stands, we dont know factually either way.
It opens rhe gate to weapons that functionally never existed in their intended role.
Im relatively easy with stuff being added and removed however the kikka falls into the bracket of stuff like tiger 2 10.5cm , it was intended but never functionally created.
idk if u are ragebaiting or not, i agree on remove the 38mt but the kikka did fly and has powerplant to installed gun, and using logic and common sense it would definitely make sense for it to have guns, as it was designed to intercept B29, how would u intercept something when you dont have guns? Banzai it?? Hell no Never flew with arnaments does not mean it cannot fit it
KH-38MT should be remove because its not even real, its a mockups unlike kikka which did fly once
but the kikka was created
and you can say tiger II 105 is like the KH-38mt arguement
the base is the kh-38M but different seekers, just like Tiger II 105, tiger II chasis with bigga guns but only their base exist, neither exist
kikka, created, blueprinted, flied, has guns that was created for it. Due to “unfortunate” circumstances it never get fitted
but blueprinted created, guns that is created for it, intended to be interceptors, WW2 interceptors = put guns to be interceptors then qualified to be one
then kikka should be ingame, enough proof to be ingame unlike KH-38MT
Wasn’t it shown that 105 tiger 2 physically wouldn’t work?
that too
To be fair to him the most compelling point anyone has made for its non existence was Mythic speculating the EN rosboronexport website was out of date, which is now clearly not the case since we have brochures from Zhuhai 2024 stating otherwise.
Kh-38M is a program for a family of modular missiles if the IR seeker was cancelled indefinitely there would be a cancellation order and memos about reassigning the team working on the IR seeker at KVRT to other projects. Those are your silver bullets go find them.
As for your kikka take, For the sake of argument we say the 38MT seeker was never mounted like kikkas guns, the warhead and rocket body exist and have been used successfully in tests and combat so by your logic like the kikka its fine for addition.
Becuase i disagree im rage baiting ?.
It never
intended to have it.
It never existed with weapons installed as far as we know
You cant see the hypocrisy in yhe following statement that i will adress.
Kikka as far as we historically know flew as a plane without armerments fitted hell theres.not even ballistic tests for the guns.
The plane as it is in game never existed
The tiger 2 105mm gun was trialed as well as attempted to be fitted the kb38mt falls into this category.
The kikka never flew with weapons fitted nor have i ever seen in existed with guns fitted weve no idea the ballistic profile of the ammunition nor weapons on tbe platform, it was added back when japan needed it much like the ry2s
blueprints alone is not enough to justify adding things in wt
It’s hypocrisy at its finest arguably the kikka is in the exact same position