Most likely why the original news article about it thought it was SALH tbh, which doesnt exactly inspire confidence in the existence of the MTE imo…
1 Like
The community bug manager contacted the developer personally, he asked the developer about the Su-27 FM and passed the information to us.
The developer is Gaijin. This is not 1 person.
Wow dude. Answer my message completely. I pointed out obvious facts to you, but you were worried about one thing - the developer.
I probably now understand why you didn’t explain to me about the bug report about Rafale
so it’s a “he said, she said” deal oki
Will you answer this message in full? Or do you have no arguments?
no they requested the documentation gaijin used for the Su-27 FM
and it turned out to be the flight data of the T-10 which dosent even look close to the production Su-27
9 Likes
link proof or didn’t happen. Simple. Also this is a KH-38MT thingy, not a Su-27 thingy.
They are not fake because they were all partially designed/built. Even if they were 100% fake, there are plenty of ways that things that are fake in WT.
Based on what? If they are willing to say that the Kronshtadt or Ho-Ri Production would have worked if XYZ, then we can also assume that the incompleted vehicles would have worked based on XYZ (e.g. strengthened turret ring, adjustments to the mantlet/breach, etc. etc.).
Not really. War Thunder is mechanically better than WoT. Further, the tanks are not pure fantasy…
Basic thinking and dimensions
KH-38MT, Ho-Ri need to be fully removed
Naval follows a different set of rules so it’s dumb to bring it as an example
1 Like
Thats even funnier.
Ppl contacted some of devs via CBRs.
Funny thats theres was some Ralin’s messages long time ago, asking to elaborate/discuss/etc ghraps of same source
Horrid examples, WT naval has a different standard for additions (keel laid minimum), and the Ho-Ri production is slated for removal when they find a suitable replacement, iirc it was also added under the assumption it was real, mistakenly-so.
7 Likes
I can provide more if you want, those were just the first to come to mind.
So we can be unrealistic…
Lmk when they do. Even when it’s removed, it won’t be removed for everyone. So still unrealistic.
Bro…
1 Like
I understand. You have no arguments…
Remember this message. You are only concerned about Russian weapons, but don’t forget about other problems too
1 Like
Ragebait?
1 Like
the bait used to be believable
It’s funny how people get mad when presented with the faulty logic behind their own perceived distinctions if it were applied in other circumstances.
My position is clear: remove everything which is unrealistic from the game or permit a degree of unrealism for the sake of fairness and balance.
If by unrealistic you mean the game’s assumption that equipment works perfectly/as intended, that is not the same unrealistic as a fictional vehicle like jet powered R2Y2, Ho-Ri, F-16AJ, Tiger 2 105, Panther 2, and flakpanzer 341, or fictional weapon like Kh-38MT, which should be removed promptly
1 Like
yeah a Kh-38 with a maverick seeker is really bad for realism
they should give it its stated loal abilities so it can be used at 40km
No- on a more fundamental level:
-Spawn Protection
-Unlimited Fuel
-Mini-Maps
-10 second repairs
-Nerfs to bombs/munitions to make them less OP
-Unrealistic teams
-Unrealistic engagements
-Unrealistic maps
-Unrealistic sound feedback
I can move on to more specifics with vehicle implementation if you want…
tbh this isnt even a question of “proving validity” they now have a justifiable reason to remove the weapon system from game on the grounds of balance, ill accept the ML variants as there are laser guided so in reality your not flinging 4+ at a time with zero impunity.
I’ve said it before but gaijin need to now start looking at removing weapon systems on Jets for the sake of balance or at least limit the amount they take (SP changes isnt enough) its the spam thats the issue
1 Like