The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

“Normal” GNSS modules are not “active” nor “homing”

So it’s possible by “Active satellite navigation” and “Active homing device” they mean something more than just regular passive GNSS guidance for the MKE …

And if you agree that the old brochure is very poorly worded then it doesn’t prove anything since by “inertial” they could also mean “inertial + satellite” (And just worded it poorly) just like in the video …

Gaijin doesn’t favour any nation… Did you say this when the US had the best AtG missiles?

1 Like

There you have his response:

The US AtG missile actually existed tho…

Which got nerfed later, we haven’t seen a single nerf to the KH38MT at all.

do you see a missile on those pylons, because i do

image

3 Likes

TBF that seems to be a Su-34

I’m yet to see any evidence for Su-30SM carrying Kh-38 or TGP

1 Like

yes theres “a” missile on that Pylon which is the whole point of this thread

1 Like

tbf
give it more drag coefficient to make it closer to avg cruise speed
gen 2 thermal and 15x zoom(which is still better than 65D btw)
limit 4 on su-34(brochure mockups) and 0 kh-38 at all on su-30sm(since there isnt any proof of it, even 38ML)
then i think its good enough

1 Like

it is a su34 you can see that by looking at the landing gear

the point was that the missile is not fake

2 Likes

For 30SM they are made up with t220 partially confirmed by gaijin to be fake, as well as kh38 on 25sm3, that is obvious part

it is a kh-38mt we already went through that a few times

1 Like

i still believe its a mockups because they wouldnt reveal it publicly

1 Like

Have you seen publicly non mockup newest Kh-59 variants used by Su-57?

Okay, is it functional? Why isn’t it mentioned on their site anymore? What more do you have other than a brochure image showing it only mounted. That doesn’t prove that its functioning.

5 Likes

wasnt there that one consultant that hated chinese vehicles and witheld some documents so they are worse ingame

you do realize its literally just a matter of removing the missile trail right? aim9m NEVER had a single problem of its smoke trail appearing, the chaparral was clearly on purpose.

and this conversation is offtopic now its pointless to continue it.

there was a tech mod, he got removed.

we have range, speed and stats on the thermal imager
image

and you wont get some of them without having a functional seeker

2 Likes

Yes, but given how they require proof of carriage for other planes (and not just any missile, but actual live missiles; E.g. in the case of A-10C and triple AGM-65 next to the TGP), automatically giving them to every new top tier Russian plane without any proof is somewhat unjustified …

2 Likes