I dont.
End of story.
Its a fair and balanced counterpart of the american maverick.
So why not give the russians the kh25 instead of soemthing OP
It’s like comparing X-25 (worse) to X-29 in many characteristics, so why should X-25 be at the level of X-38?
Yes… the kh25mtp would replace the 38mt on TT cas.
is the a-10c with the agm at 12.7 in ground?
and without the 38 there is no reason for the 25sm3 to exist in the game because all the other su-25s can get the kh-25mtp as well
1 Like
25 and 29 mostly only differ in explosive mass unless its the extended range version which has more range.
It isnt.
Thats why im arguing that it should be the given missile instead
Gaijin can restrict weapons completely and has done so for balance purposes.
Case and point, r73 on mig29s
They have not however restricted them partially
Even if the Kh-38MT is real (and compatible with the planes that have it in-game), it shouldn’t be in the game. The Kh-38ML should have been enough and surely there are other options for FnF that aren’t as game-breaking
6 Likes
My point is if every nation is getting a better SPAA, Russia would get the best one out of all of them.
I oppose CAS being in GRB at all, so I don’t really seal club anyone with 38MTs and thus I have no personal gains with it remaining in the game.
@Zannafrancy12
I’m not a Gaijin developer so I can only speculate.
I was just pointing at the fact how even more urgent bugs took a long time to be fixed, so this one getting stretched this long isn’t something unusual.
@Armen_Lozone
So the MTP is an IR + IOG missile with M2.2 speeds and decent optics ?
I’m happy with reducing the total amount from 30SM + SU-34 combo spawn from 12 to 4 but apparently it’s still not enough. I don’t think anyone would be this generous, especially not Gaijin.
Because missiles don’t exist in a vacuum and other things have to be considered as well.
for the purposes of GRB it is quite potent and capable. if you get the kills, what does it matter the technology it has or doesnt have?
why reduce the load when u can get a full load of the lesser ranged but probably just as potent Kh-25MT/P??
well lets break that vacuum, the Kh-25, unlike the maverick, does not depend as much on launch speed to achieve its maximum 10km range.
This is 110% likely just to be your average phone camera doing a bunch of exposure compensation etc etc.
1 Like
yeah we found that out to be a false alarm. mb. forget it
@MotorolaCRO
Su-34 is compatible with Kh-25 family. see WT loadouts
wait it was @ron_2303 who asked
1 Like
Didn’t see that image before, but maybe I missed something.
Looks really weird though, there’s no sensor/lens and gimbal assembly visible at all, just a circuit board.
that is your proof?
the WT loadouts
that is 100% a mock up, in the 38mt picture we have from the Marks expo we could atleast see the gimbal and seeker element
among one of, im still looking for images
so WT is proof that the 38mt exists and can be mounted on the su34 and su30?
If it’s slightly better then, as I said, it’s okay as RU as a nation don’t have good FMs in the game. Same goes for China.
@Armen_Lozone
Everything can get the kills, but it’s about efficiency so having higher stats on the missile will do just that.
If those were just as potent then there’s no reason no replace anything as they’ll perform the same.
I don’t get you here.
By vacuum I meant the planes itself and their FMs + A2A + other stuff matter as well.
if you didnt catch up with the thread… we moved past that
do you need an OP missile to do it or can you achieve similar results with a lesser ranged and less explosive missile?
which ever plane can carry Kh-38 in the current game version wont lose any other weaponry nor have an affected FM or anything if the 38 is replaced by the 25