That’s a dangerous path you’re walking on.
If you want to equalize each and every metric for all vehicles, you’ll end up with exact copies that only have a different skin applied.
Let’s give everyone 65D or equivalent.
Let’s give everyone MICA or equivalent.
Let’s give everyone Rafale’s FM or equivalent.
Let’s give everyone 4s reload as Japanese tanks.
Let’s give everyone DM53 or equivalent.
List goes on and on…
I want my stuff to be unique, not some soulless copy of vehicles at it’s BR.
Was this photo already or not from these 6000+ comments and garbage?
Just admit you want your seal club toy to stay in the game, literally every nation has access to AGM-65. Suddenly it’s not okay when it comes to Russia, who would still retain Kh-38ML and seal club outside AA range lmao.
you think its not?
Checking back in after a week of not giving a damn cause this chat was going nowhere, any word from smin yet?
no from smin
but seems like 38mt or actually 38mte probably existed in some form now
likely is still unfinished but more real than before
(sadly)
Looking for it
Yeah… wait did i mention a premium?
i mean there is not even close to enough evidence to warrant its addition ingame yet. still very much grasping at straws
no but, you are suggesting that it should replace the 38mt so i was looking at them specifically
It’ll have the same effectiveness with the 25MTP.
Why the big issue?
No need to limit them when they can get a balanced missile for full load.
Su30 isnt proven to have them at all afaik but i could be wrong
I dont.
End of story.
Its a fair and balanced counterpart of the american maverick.
So why not give the russians the kh25 instead of soemthing OP
It’s like comparing X-25 (worse) to X-29 in many characteristics, so why should X-25 be at the level of X-38?
Yes… the kh25mtp would replace the 38mt on TT cas.
is the a-10c with the agm at 12.7 in ground?
and without the 38 there is no reason for the 25sm3 to exist in the game because all the other su-25s can get the kh-25mtp as well
25 and 29 mostly only differ in explosive mass unless its the extended range version which has more range.
It isnt.
Thats why im arguing that it should be the given missile instead
Gaijin can restrict weapons completely and has done so for balance purposes.
Case and point, r73 on mig29s
They have not however restricted them partially
Even if the Kh-38MT is real (and compatible with the planes that have it in-game), it shouldn’t be in the game. The Kh-38ML should have been enough and surely there are other options for FnF that aren’t as game-breaking
My point is if every nation is getting a better SPAA, Russia would get the best one out of all of them.
I oppose CAS being in GRB at all, so I don’t really seal club anyone with 38MTs and thus I have no personal gains with it remaining in the game.
@Zannafrancy12
I’m not a Gaijin developer so I can only speculate.
I was just pointing at the fact how even more urgent bugs took a long time to be fixed, so this one getting stretched this long isn’t something unusual.
@Armen_Lozone
So the MTP is an IR + IOG missile with M2.2 speeds and decent optics ?
I’m happy with reducing the total amount from 30SM + SU-34 combo spawn from 12 to 4 but apparently it’s still not enough. I don’t think anyone would be this generous, especially not Gaijin.
Because missiles don’t exist in a vacuum and other things have to be considered as well.
for the purposes of GRB it is quite potent and capable. if you get the kills, what does it matter the technology it has or doesnt have?
why reduce the load when u can get a full load of the lesser ranged but probably just as potent Kh-25MT/P??
well lets break that vacuum, the Kh-25, unlike the maverick, does not depend as much on launch speed to achieve its maximum 10km range.