Can’t really see what those pictures represent, better mark it on the original.
Markings on the missile ?
That missile looks like a 38MT and any other comparisons fell short.
2 Likes
Would a non functional missle have safety clamps to mount it to a wing?
theyre the side to the left and right of the color difference near the seeker section and warhead section
1 Like
aircraft dont use clamps… 🫥
theyre usually pins and little explosive ejectors if not rails
Its a KH38 base. That means nothing.
The working KH38MT with the IR seeker being integrated and working is the important part.
The base KH38 having clamps doesnr matter
7 Likes
That also might be markings.
1 Like
bruh thats… not what they are at all.
denying it is like denying the sky is blue
Thanks for your insight on the matter. No one here really knows what those are and claiming such thing is foolish at best.
You can believe whatever you want though.
3 Likes
look
there is a color difference which should not be there
mockup:
supposed real missile:
no need.
aint doing it for the clout
claiming that there is a color difference is foolish?
to the left of the line i pointed out, the color is this
to the right of the line i pointed out, the color is this
not the same
where as in the mockup we see that the missile is supposed to be of an evenly similar color mostly all around
that color is this
contrasting:
this and
this
where as in the mockup its mostly an even
this
aint about belief. its about what i can see in front of me
2 Likes
And you know for a fact not a single additional marking has been added in the meantime ?
Thanks for putting them side by side, now it looks like a 38MT even more.
1 Like
Which part of missile do you discuss? Because I see 100% visual match between mockup and real one. Section between seeker head and body is clearly visible and also markings on body parts are visible.
1 Like
thats an inverse claim which you gotta prove. not me.
we have no reason to think any markings would be applied and even if there would be, markings aint 3D like here
The circle boundaries are cut if you look.
Theres a section missing.
1 Like
especially if the clamp claim is to be believed
1 Like
Even then,look at what would be the edge of where the seeker head joins, its missing part of the circle transitioning into a flat line across the entire photo vertically
1 Like
It very much is.
You first claimed that the metallic ring extended way back to the mounting bracket.
Look, missile looks like a 38MT based on it’s shape and looks of the seeker. You focusing on the markings that might be created who knows when is funny.
Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in “what about …?”) is a pejorative for the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of a defense against the original accusation.
Clearly.
3 Likes
i didnt?
lmao when
i aint denying that it looks like a 38MT or MTE.
im questioning if the image is doctored which is most likely is
ELA reveals some damning editing fingerprints
there are irregular ‘regular shapes’ (random squares) as well as areas of differing pixel densities which usually points towards an image of different resolution being overlaid onto another image.
this is the area on and around the seekerhead
the changes in brightness itself are proof of being doctored as per the ELA definition:
13 Likes
checked, again not actual valid proof
I can say the aim9b has thrust vectoring. source? brochure i found from the electric boogaloo
8 Likes
then plot twist its a Kh-38ML
1 Like