The one on the left is the ML you can clearly see the silver ring and rim casting shadows and reflections while the one on the right has the seeker at angle and does not cast any reflections. The MT seeker is a straight white tube with the seeker pointing downwards like it does at the airshow pictures.
and this is a good example on the shadows being casted in a weird way (credits to ony for finding the pic)
Reflections of other things are themselves a thing?
Look it’s the MT! :D
the left looks like ML because of reflection on the metal ring
the right one is pure white
they are both the same missile he just made the joke that one its the MT cuz of the different angle the light its refracting on it, they are both and ML just that the light casting on one its better than the other
Interesting, I wonder why its still shown in brochures in 2024 if its no longer advertised by ROE
Man, you literally cannot make anything out of that picture, I also pointed out that the missile on the right is most likely the MT because it does not cast shadows and does not have any rims around its seeker lmao.
If that ring was an reflection it would be visible on the one side only.
It does.
Also what the red circles even are supposed to be proof of? It’s the mountingpoint that both missiles have.
and typhoon doesnt get fnf armament. Russia still could get Tv missles etc.
Its fair that russia gets an imaginerary missle but typhoon isnt allowed to get an fnf missle
definitly seems fair
idc about typhoon. And this is not the Thread for that.
I mean, the EF2000 still is banging, you can lock the laser on and go 3rd person, like wtih GBU’s however the KH38MT should be removed until we get some confirmation of its existence.
The KH29T would do fine on the su30 for example
i think RU strategy is
they are advertising it to china
China buy RU = more money
more money = more development on missiles
missiles done = finally IR ordinance
profit and sucess
its a comparison to similar situations.
Your whole statement just is useless and untrue. its nothing fair about it or sth that needs to be fullfilled
oh hey gun job since u are here can u check the above
If they were really that desperate to ask for funding for an IR seeker, they would probably give out information on what they’re wanting to build and with what performance, to entice supporters.
Seeing how vaguely mentioned the IR part is, I think it’s already incorporated to the missile.
Look where the circle is and the top bar or whatever it is. You can see exactly where the circle is.
im pretty sure that part wont be on the brochure
