It’s often fairly difficult to tell exactly where deficiencies lie in any given person’s understanding of the issue, let alone their level of technical literacy regarding a topic or papers and their willingness to go and then bridge them (or have the time to do so), themselves even if I provide direct links to relevant assets to do so, also to some degree not everyone is willing to even accept any explanation provided and will challenge it regardless of supplied references and sources, which is why I constantly link backwards for the lay third-party to judge for themselves (should they wish) the level to which I am will to go to to show sources.
To some degree I’d expect and want some push back on issues so I can refine explanations and find reasons and further avenues to go looking for bridging sources to strengthen arguments and gradually expand the pool of excerpts that I myself know about and can then further reference.
For example How would you even go about explaining Control-loop topology to the average WT forum user, it just gets into the weeds far to quickly, or otherwise into university level math that many aren’t even able to conceptualize, due to lacking five or six critical layers of understanding to even approach the simplified block / flow diagrams.
When writing the report itself, I hit the character limit four times over (and source limit, for direct submission, had to use a zip file) for the bug report portal and repeatedly had to make recursive executive calls as to which major group of arguments to focus on and remove others that had less evidence, more tenuous links, or otherwise less relevant in order to make things significantly more concise to free up headroom in the character count so I couldn’t actually reference, or cover all of the contributing areas I wanted it to.
Much of the lack of flow is solely caused of multiple concurrent re-writes, and about 85% of the relevant content of the report being on the cutting room floor somewhere due to the reduction of scope.
I get it but, to some degree I’m limited by what sources & excerpts I have on hand and the areas where I feel that the Article explaining Gaijin’s reasoning is weakest, or makes jumps in the logic compared to the weight of evidence to hand that can be directly linked to the FIM-43, -92 or Igla, and this be self evidently directly relevant, instead of being imposed as relevant by those on-high.
Also I don’t have the time or drive to cover all potential avenues, And I doubt that people really want my specific interpretation what is important without at least some way to see for themselves within a technical discussion, because as evident I will minimize some aspects simply because I feel I don’t have what I need to prove things concretely, or at least without something to back up my position, or become to circular where new evidence keep being introduced progressively instead of reaching consensus as to what has already been provided.