after 4500 messages, this thread has taught me 2 things:
the kh-38MT (reiterating for the people in the back) MT does not exist beyond a simple idea of a “what if”
people keep falling for bait way too easily, or at least i sincerely hope that is bait and not your actual opinion
it does not help that the silence from devs and the lead forum mods on one of, if not THE biggest poll on the forums is telling on the utter disregard for balance and another nail in the already full coffin that is the “russian bias” allegations
if my job taught me something, you can have appeal court back you up and people will still take their case to the next instance court, get shot down there and still be convinced that theyre right.
Would be nice for both. I don’t really care about the generation of the thermal sight of the targeting pod, it has no real impact on gameplay, but things looking better is good I suppose.
Can you get any more dramatic? The post is two weeks old, the weapon has been in game for more than a year. It always takes time to get official feedback, if there is any at all. Did you cry about “american bias” when the US was dominating top tier CAS even worse?
AGM-84 SLAM, wouldnt necessarily have all that much more range than AASM or KH-38 do at the moment, especially with the hard range limits on seekrs/TPod.
Yeah, but still largely limited to about 15-20km being generous. With KH-38 and AASM being theoretically of use out to 30km at the moment, something like AGM-84 is a reasonable option to match it for the US.
Dont be silly. of course not. Just Soviet mains trying to justfiy why they need(ed) a paper weapon and why it not even the best AGM in the game. Apparently SAL only Brimstone 1 is a better missile to the KH-38MT
Given a hard limit of about 30km on AGMs at the moment (at least without just GPS guided CCRP Yeeting) It only adds about 7-10km more range over the AGM-65. So relatively speaking, it is “a little more”.
