not super shallow but not too high angle, idk ive just had leo turret cheeks and gun barrel eat them
I dont even bring mavs on the harrier anymore with how many spawn points they cost for how few you get, I tend to bring 5 jdams 3 gbu 12 and an amraam for the bigger pylons
after 4500 messages, this thread has taught me 2 things:
the kh-38MT (reiterating for the people in the back) MT does not exist beyond a simple idea of a “what if”
people keep falling for bait way too easily, or at least i sincerely hope that is bait and not your actual opinion
it does not help that the silence from devs and the lead forum mods on one of, if not THE biggest poll on the forums is telling on the utter disregard for balance and another nail in the already full coffin that is the “russian bias” allegations
if my job taught me something, you can have appeal court back you up and people will still take their case to the next instance court, get shot down there and still be convinced that theyre right.
Would be nice for both. I don’t really care about the generation of the thermal sight of the targeting pod, it has no real impact on gameplay, but things looking better is good I suppose.
Can you get any more dramatic? The post is two weeks old, the weapon has been in game for more than a year. It always takes time to get official feedback, if there is any at all. Did you cry about “american bias” when the US was dominating top tier CAS even worse?
AGM-84 SLAM, wouldnt necessarily have all that much more range than AASM or KH-38 do at the moment, especially with the hard range limits on seekrs/TPod.