and it really isnt uncommon for mockup weapons to exist long before the real article is even much past the drawing board let alone built.
Given the… timeline. With these being first advertised in 2017?. If they got little or no interest either from the Russian Air force or their usual export partners, especially prior to… events in 2022, where I could see them rapidly directing resources elsewhere, then its not that surprising the project may have simply been canceled or postponed.
highly possible paused, cuz i dont think its fake but i dont think its completely real, probably only having limited testing by the company who made them at most specially with the ammount of resources being used rn for the one i shall not name
I can’t remember when I last got a hit that didn’t kill, it’s working very reliably in my experience.
The Harriers, F-16s, F-15s and Gripens have a targeting pod for them though.
Because they’re too heavy for the TER.
and there it is
counting deleted replies thats just over 5000 replies and still no new evidence confirming kh-38MT exists
discussing possible reasons of it, since it probably exists just like really limited, and probably not 100% functional i still think it should be removed since its pretty much a “fictional” weapon atm but rn its
if you look at the agm-65f entry here, it lists the TER as a compatable launcher, and as stated earlier the TER can hold at least 2 of them, so in game you should be able to bring at least 4 65G/F and 2 65D if not 6 65G/F
KWS, A-10A late and prolly bunch of others dont.
oh, the poll is back at 84% to 16% instead of 83% to 17%
That’s interesting, I wasn’t aware of that. Hopefully they’ll add it, but ever since the high caliber HEAT rework I’ve gone back to running the 65D over the 65G anyways, even on platforms like the Harrier without TER.
yeah RN its better to have 6 65D over 2 65G but the D is still not as reliable, I still have them fail to kill MBTs pretty often
In my experience the D works better, which is why I run them even on the Harrier. Weird, I haven’t had them fail to kill anything in a long time. Are you taking super shallow approaches or something?
not super shallow but not too high angle, idk ive just had leo turret cheeks and gun barrel eat them
I dont even bring mavs on the harrier anymore with how many spawn points they cost for how few you get, I tend to bring 5 jdams 3 gbu 12 and an amraam for the bigger pylons
Though its a shame the Harrier Gr7 at least doesnt get its outer Pylon AGM-65 bringing us to 6 and the TIALD is artificially nerfed to Gen 1
Holy jesus.
i think things like F-15E or Vark would be able to bring atleast 4 no?
1 on each hardpoint seems too little
after 4500 messages, this thread has taught me 2 things:
the kh-38MT (reiterating for the people in the back) MT does not exist beyond a simple idea of a “what if”
people keep falling for bait way too easily, or at least i sincerely hope that is bait and not your actual opinion
it does not help that the silence from devs and the lead forum mods on one of, if not THE biggest poll on the forums is telling on the utter disregard for balance and another nail in the already full coffin that is the “russian bias” allegations
But in all manuals 65G non autorized for LAU-88A
if my job taught me something, you can have appeal court back you up and people will still take their case to the next instance court, get shot down there and still be convinced that theyre right.
Would be nice for both. I don’t really care about the generation of the thermal sight of the targeting pod, it has no real impact on gameplay, but things looking better is good I suppose.
Can you get any more dramatic? The post is two weeks old, the weapon has been in game for more than a year. It always takes time to get official feedback, if there is any at all. Did you cry about “american bias” when the US was dominating top tier CAS even worse?
is there any 65D replacement that is better because i bet gaijin would add sth in the future that is either the kh-38mt that is real or some else
